ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023
Survey assessing policies regarding patient age and provision of fertility treatment in the United States.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physician views on ethically challenging clinical scenarios: a society for reproductive endocrinology and infertility member survey.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine what policies exist regarding age and provision of fertility treatment in United States fertility clinics.
methodsMedical directors of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member clinics were surveyed regarding clinic demographics and current policies pertaining to age and provision of fertility treatment. Univariate comparisons were performed using Chi-square and Fisher exact tests as appropriate, with significance set at P ≤ 0.05.
resultsOf the 366 clinics surveyed, 18.9% (69/366) responded. A majority of clinics who responded 88.4% (61/69) reported having a policy regarding patient age and provision of fertility treatment. Responding clinics with an age policy did not differ from those without a policy on the basis of geographical location, (p = 0.5), insurance mandate status (p = 0.9), practice type (p = 0.4), or annual number of ART cycles (p = 0.7). Of all clinics who responded, 73.9% (51/69) had a maximum maternal age for autologous IVF, with a median of 45 years (range 42-54). Similarly, 79.7% (55/69) of responding clinics had a maximum maternal age for donor oocyte IVF, with a median of 52 years (range 48-56). Slightly under half, 43.4% (30/69) of responding clinics had a maximum maternal age for fertility treatment other than IVF (including ovulation induction or ovarian stimulation with or without IUI) with a median of 46 years (range 42-55). Of note, only 4.3% (3/69) of responding clinics had a policy with respect to maximum paternal age, with a median of 55 years (range 55-70). The most commonly cited reasons for having an age-limit policy were maternal risks of pregnancy, lower ART success rates, fetal/neonatal risks, and concerns about patients' ability to parent at an older age. More than half 56.5% (39/69) of responding clinics reported making exceptions to these policies, most commonly for patients who have pre-existing embryos. The majority of medical directors who responded to the survey believed there should be an ASRM guideline regarding maximum maternal age for autologous IVF 71% (49/69), donor oocyte IVF 78% (54/69) and other fertility treatments 62% (43/69).
conclusionsMost fertility clinics who responded to this national survey reported having a policy regarding maternal age (but not paternal age) and provision of fertility treatment. Policies were based on risk of maternal/fetal complications, lower success rates at older age, and concerns about patients' ability to parent at an older age. The majority of medical directors of responding clinics believed there should be an ASRM guideline regarding age and provision of fertility treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.