Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405645›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Bacterial Cell Display for Selection of Affibody Molecules.

Charles Dahlsson Leitao, Stefan Ståhl, John Löfblom

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles Dahlsson LeitaoDepartment of Protein Science, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan StåhlDepartment of Protein Science, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
John LöfblomDepartment of Protein Science, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. lofblom@kth.se.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the principles for generation of affibody molecules using bacterial display on the Gram-negative Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive Staphylococcus carnosus, respectively. Affibody molecules are small and robust alternative scaffold proteins that have been explored for therapeutic, diagnostic, and biotechnological applications. They typically exhibit high-stability, affinity, and specificity with high modularity of functional domains. Due to the small size of the scaffold, affibody molecules are rapidly excreted through renal filtration and can efficiently extravasate from blood and penetrate tissues. Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that affibody molecules are promising and safe complements to antibodies for in vivo diagnostic imaging and therapy. Sorting of affibody libraries displayed on bacteria using fluorescence-activated cell sorting is an effective and straightforward methodology and has been used successfully to generate novel affibody molecules with high affinity for a diverse range of molecular targets.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAffibody moleculesBacterial displayEscherichia coliStaphylococcus carnosus

Identifiers

PMID37405645
OpenAlexW4383187089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.