Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405624›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2023

Effect of data size on tooth numbering performance via artificial intelligence using panoramic radiographs.

Semih Gülüm, Seçilay Kutal, Kader Cesur Aydin, Gazi Akgün, Aleyna Akdağ

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Semih Gülüm *AVL Research and Engineering, Abdurrahmangazi Mah. Ataturk Cad. No: 22 11/22 Kat: 6 Sultanbeyli, Istanbul, 34920, Turkey.
Seçilay Kutal *AREAL.ai, San Francisco, USA.
Kader Cesur Aydin *School of Dentistry, Head of Department Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Istanbul Medipol University, Ataturk Bulvarı No: 27 Unkapanı, Istanbul, 34083, Turkey. kadercesur@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-4197
Gazi Akgün *Technology Faculty RTE Campus, Marmara University, T1/203, Maltepe, Istanbul, 34854, Turkey.
Aleyna AkdağSchool of Dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Goztepe Mah, Ataturk Cad, Beykoz, Istanbul, 34810, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to investigate the effect of number of data on model performance, for the detection of tooth numbering problem on dental panoramic radiographs, with the help of image processing and deep learning algorithms. STUDY

designThe data set consists of 3000 anonymous dental panoramic X-rays of adult individuals. Panoramic X-rays were labeled on the basis of 32 classes in line with the FDI tooth numbering system. In order to examine the relationship between the number of data used in image processing algorithms and model performance, four different datasets which include 1000, 1500, 2000 and 2500 panoramic X-rays, were used. The training of the models was carried out with the YOLOv4 algorithm and trained models were tested on a fixed test dataset with 500 data and compared based on F1 score, mAP, sensitivity, precision and recall metrics.

resultsThe performance of the model increased as the number of data used during the training of the model increased. Therefore, the last model trained with 2500 data showed the highest success among all the trained models.

conclusionDataset size is important for dental enumeration, and large samples should be considered as more reliable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceToothAdultAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, PanoramicArtificial intelligenceHealth technologiesImage processingPanoramic x-rayTooth numbering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.