Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405620›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

Predicting mild cognitive impairment progression to Alzheimer's disease based on machine learning analysis of cortical morphological features.

Wei Wang, Jiaxuan Peng, Jie Hou, Zhongyu Yuan, Wutao Xie, Guohe Mao, Yaling Pan, Yuan Shao, Zhenyu Shu

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei Wang *Jinzhou Medical University Postgraduate Education Base (Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jiaxuan Peng *Jinzhou Medical University Postgraduate Education Base (Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jie HouJinzhou Medical University Postgraduate Education Base (Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongyu YuanJinzhou Medical University Postgraduate Education Base (Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wutao XieDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China.
Guohe MaoBanan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yaling PanCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yuan ShaoCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhenyu ShuCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China. cooljuty@hotmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish a model for predicting mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) using morphological features extracted from a joint analysis of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM).

methodsWe analyzed data from 121 MCI patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 32 of whom progressed to AD during a 4-year follow-up period and were classified as the progression group, while the remaining 89 were classified as the non-progression group. Patients were divided into a training set (n = 84) and a testing set (n = 37). Morphological features measured by VBM and SBM were extracted from the cortex of the training set and dimensionally reduced to construct morphological biomarkers using machine learning methods, which were combined with clinical data to build a multimodal combinatorial model. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves on the testing set.

resultsThe Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) score, apolipoprotein E (APOE4), and morphological biomarkers were independent predictors of MCI progression to AD. The combinatorial model based on the independent predictors had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.866 in the training set and 0.828 in the testing set, with sensitivities of 0.773 and 0.900 and specificities of 0.903 and 0.747, respectively. The number of MCI patients classified as high-risk for progression to AD was significantly different from those classified as low-risk in the training set, testing set, and entire dataset, according to the combinatorial model (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe combinatorial model based on cortical morphological features can identify high-risk MCI patients likely to progress to AD, potentially providing an effective tool for clinical screening.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseCortical morphologyMachine learningMild cognitive impairmentWhite matter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.