ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Development and external validation of a prediction model for the transition from mild to moderate or severe form of COVID-19.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04481620 (Evelopment and Validation of a Prediction Model for the Transition From Mild to Moderate Form of COVID-19, Using Data From Chest CT), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evelopment and Validation of a Prediction Model for the Transition From Mild to Moderate Form of COVID-19, Using Data From Chest CT
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic immune protection of exosomal T-cell epitope vaccine and antibody-inducing vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in highly humanized mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 and development of a predictive model.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a radiomics-based model for early prediction of delayed radiological recovery from Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a multicenter study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- ChatGPT as an effective tool for quality evaluation of radiomics research.European radiology · 2025Article
- Overlooked and underpowered: a meta-research addressing sample size in radiomics prediction models for binary outcomes.European radiology · 2025Article
- Development of a radiomics-based model using computed tomography imaging to assess the incidence of extrapulmonary organ involvement inFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Multicenter study on CT-based Radiomics for predicting severity and delayed recovery inFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Enhanced predictability and interpretability of COVID-19 severity based on SARS-CoV-2 genomic diversity: a comprehensive study encompassing four years of data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Lung field-based severity score (LFSS): a feasible tool to identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- HAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCOVID-19 pandemic seems to be under control. However, despite the vaccines, 5 to 10% of the patients with mild disease develop moderate to critical forms with potential lethal evolution. In addition to assess lung infection spread, chest CT helps to detect complications. Developing a prediction model to identify at-risk patients of worsening from mild COVID-19 combining simple clinical and biological parameters with qualitative or quantitative data using CT would be relevant to organizing optimal patient management.
methodsFour French hospitals were used for model training and internal validation. External validation was conducted in two independent hospitals. We used easy-to-obtain clinical (age, gender, smoking, symptoms' onset, cardiovascular comorbidities, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, immunosuppression) and biological parameters (lymphocytes, CRP) with qualitative or quantitative data (including radiomics) from the initial CT in mild COVID-19 patients.
resultsQualitative CT scan with clinical and biological parameters can predict which patients with an initial mild presentation would develop a moderate to critical form of COVID-19, with a c-index of 0.70 (95% CI 0.63; 0.77). CT scan quantification improved the performance of the prediction up to 0.73 (95% CI 0.67; 0.79) and radiomics up to 0.77 (95% CI 0.71; 0.83). Results were similar in both validation cohorts, considering CT scans with or without injection.
conclusionAdding CT scan quantification or radiomics to simple clinical and biological parameters can better predict which patients with an initial mild COVID-19 would worsen than qualitative analyses alone. This tool could help to the fair use of healthcare resources and to screen patients for potential new drugs to prevent a pejorative evolution of COVID-19. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT04481620. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT scan quantification or radiomics analysis is superior to qualitative analysis, when used with simple clinical and biological parameters, to determine which patients with an initial mild presentation of COVID-19 would worsen to a moderate to critical form. KEY POINTS: • Qualitative CT scan analyses with simple clinical and biological parameters can predict which patients with an initial mild COVID-19 and respiratory symptoms would worsen with a c-index of 0.70. • Adding CT scan quantification improves the performance of the clinical prediction model to an AUC of 0.73. • Radiomics analyses slightly improve the performance of the model to a c-index of 0.77.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.