Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405500›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Changes in serial multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET/CT functional imaging during radiation therapy can predict treatment response in patients with head and neck cancer.

Yuvnik Trada, Paul Keall, Michael Jameson, Daniel Moses, Peter Lin, Phillip Chlap, Lois Holloway, Myo Min, Dion Forstner, Allan Fowler and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Role ofCancers · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuvnik TradaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia. Yuvnik.Trada@calvarymater.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-6904
Paul KeallFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael JamesonGenesisCare St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel MosesFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter LinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Phillip ChlapDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Lois HollowayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Myo MinUniversity of Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Dion ForstnerGenesisCare St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Allan FowlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Mark T LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Liverpool Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo test if tumour changes measured using combination of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI and FDG-PET/CT performed serially during radiotherapy (RT) in mucosal head and neck carcinoma can predict treatment response.

methodsFifty-five patients from two prospective imaging biomarker studies were analysed. FDG-PET/CT was performed at baseline, during RT (week 3), and post RT (3 months). DWI was performed at baseline, during RT (weeks 2, 3, 5, 6), and post RT (1 and 3 months). The ADC

resultsThe 1-year local, regional, and distant recurrence rates were 18.2% (10/55), 7.3% (4/55), and 12.7% (7/55), respectively. ∆Week 3 ADC

conclusionsChanges in mid-treatment DWI and FDG-PET/CT imaging can predict treatment response and could be utilised in the design of future adaptive clinical trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our study shows the complementary information provided by two functional imaging modalities for mid-treatment response prediction in patients with head and neck cancer. KEY POINTS: •FDG-PET/CT and DWI MRI changes in tumour during radiotherapy in head and neck cancer can predict treatment response. •Combination of FDG-PET/CT and DWI parameters improved correlation to clinical outcome. •Week 3 was the optimal time point for DWI MRI imaging response assessment.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsBiomarkerFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and neck neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37405500
PMCPMC10667402
OpenAlexW4383186144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.