ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
Added value of zoomed-echo-planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of periampullary carcinomas.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the image quality feasibility and diagnostic value of zoomed diffusion-weighted imaging (z-EPI DWI) using echo-planar imaging (EPI) compared with conventional DWI (c-EPI DWI) in patients with periampullary disease.
methodsThirty-six patients with periampullary carcinomas and fifteen with benign periampullary disease were included in this study. All the subjects underwent MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), c-EPI DWI, and z-EPI DWI. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality of the two image sets, including overall image quality and lesion conspicuity. In addition, signal intensity and ADC measurements of DWIs in the periampullary lesions were conducted. Diagnostic accuracies of the combined image sets of MRCP and z-EPI DWI were compared with those of a combined set of MRCP and c-EPI DWI.
resultsz-EPI DWI showed significantly better image quality scores (anatomic structure visualization, 2.94 ± 0.24; overall image quality, 2.96 ± 0.17) compared to that with c-EPI DWI (anatomic structure visualization, 2.02 ± 0.22; overall image quality, 2.04 ± 0.24) (both P < 0.01). For all the periampullary malignant lesions and small lesions (≤ 20 mm), there was better delineation of lesion conspicuity and the lesion margin, as well as diagnostic confidence with z-EPI DWI (all P < 0.05). The rate of periampullary malignancy's hyperintense signal on z-EPI DWI was increased to 91.7% (33/36) compared to c-EPI DWI (69.4% (25/36)) (P = 0.023). For all malignant lesions and small lesions, the diagnostic accuracy scores were increased using the MRCP and z-EPI DWI combined set, compared to the MRCP and c-EPI DWI combined set (P < 0.05). Diagnostic accuracy for detection and differentiation of malignant lesions from benign lesions significantly improved for the MRCP and z-EPI DWI combined set compared with MRCP and c-EPI DWI combined set (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between c-EPI DWI and z-EPI DWI in the ADC values of periampullary malignant and benign lesions (P > 0.05).
conclusionsz-EPI DWI has an advantage that could lead to remarkable image quality improvements and enhanced lesion visualization of periampullary carcinomas. z-EPI DWI was superior to c-EPI DWI for detecting, delineating, and diagnosing the lesions, particularly for small challenging lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.