Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405400›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2023

[Changes in the routine work and moral distress in psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic : A survey among physicians active in inpatient care in Germany].

Jeanne Guinaudeau, Paul Christian Baier, Katja Kühlmeyer, Christoph Borzikowsky, Laura Terheyden, Victoria Dorothea Witt, Annette Rogge

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeanne GuinaudeauZentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Niemannsweg 147, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. jeanne.guinaudeau@uksh.de.
Paul Christian BaierZentrum für Integrative Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Niemannsweg 147, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland.
Katja KühlmeyerInstitut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
Christoph BorzikowskyInstitut für Medizinische Informatik und Statistik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland.
Laura TerheydenKlinik für Neurologie, Nordseeklinik Helgoland, Helgoland, Deutschland.
Victoria Dorothea WittSozialpsychiatrie und Gesundheitsförderung Kreis Segeberg, Bad Segeberg, Deutschland.
Annette RoggeKlinik für Neurologie, Nordseeklinik Helgoland, Helgoland, Deutschland.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESegeberger Kliniken · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic a number of ethical challenges have arisen in the healthcare system. A psychological response to moral challenges is termed moral distress (MD).

objectiveIdentification of causes of MD in inpatient psychiatric care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. MATERIAL AND

methodsA survey was conducted using a self-administered non-validated online questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional study, in which 26 items about the experience of MD were examined and open questions about the handling of the pandemic and its effects on everyday work were posed. Physicians who worked in inpatient psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany were surveyed anonymously with a convenience sample. The data acquisition took place between 17 November 2020 and 6 May 2021.

resultsA total of 141 participants were included. They indicated multiple pandemic-related changes in their daily work partly resulting in MD.

conclusionMD is a neglected potential burden of inpatient psychiatric care under pandemic conditions (and beyond), which requires further research and an adequate handling. These results include implications for decision makers in crisis teams as well as a need for support services such as clinical ethics consultation services.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInpatientsMoralsPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesAllocationClinical ethicsMoral challengesPsychiatryPublic health ethics

Identifiers

PMID37405400
PMCPMC10499671
OpenAlexW4383186157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.