Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405326›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2023

Fluorescent Imaging in Visceral Surgery: Current Opportunities and Future Perspectives.

Philipp H von Kroge, Anna Duprée

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp H von KrogeDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna DupréeDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fluorescent imaging using indocyanine green (FI-ICG) has become quite popular in the past century, giving the surgeon various pre- and intraoperative approaches in visceral surgery. Nevertheless, several aspects and pitfalls of using the technology need to be addressed. Summary: This article focused on the applications of FI-ICG in esophageal and colorectal surgery as this is where the clinical relevance is most important. Important benchmark studies were summarized to explain the background. In addition, dosage, the timing of application, and future perspectives - especially quantification methods - were the article's content. Key Message: There are currently encouraging data on the use of FI-ICG, particularly concerning perfusion assessment to reduce anastomotic leakage, although its use is mainly subjective. The optimal dosage remains unclear; for perfusion evaluation, it should be around 0.1 mg/kg body weight. Moreover, the quantification of FI-ICG opens new possibilities, so that reference values may be available in the future. However, in addition to perfusion measurement, the detection of additional hepatic lesions such as liver metastases or lesions of peritoneal carcinomatosis is also possible. A standardization of FI-ICG and further studies are needed to fully utilize FI-ICG.

Indexed as

Fluorescence imagingIndocyanine greenPerfusion measurementQuantification

Identifiers

PMID37405326
PMCPMC10315688
OpenAlexW4381162622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.