ArticleOrthopedic reviews2023
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Past, Present and Future.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Choice of Hip Arthroplasty: HRA or THA? Revealed by Meta-Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Hip resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum of 14 years: revision is concentrated among female patients with dysplasia and small components.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in orthopedics · 2026Review
- Preoperative Templating in Hip Resurfacing: Impact on Implant Sizing and Component Positioning.Hip & pelvis · 2025Article
- A 15° valgus femoral prosthesis orientation optimizes biomechanics in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- A 62-Year Follow-Up of Vitallium Cup Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Review of Longevity in Historical Context.Cureus · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Approach in Hip Prosthesis Identification and Addressing Radiographic Outcome Measures.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Establishing minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds following birmingham hip resurfacing.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Towards the First Generation of Biomimetic Fixation for Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Breaking Barriers: Addressing Gender Disparities in Hip Resurfacing Surgery Access in the United States.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The history of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has faced numerous challenges and undergone decades of evolution in materials and methods. These innovations have been translated to the successes of current prostheses and represent a surgical and mechanical achievement. Modern HRAs now have long term outcomes with excellent results in specific patient groups as demonstrated in national joint registries. This article reviews the key moments in the history of HRAs with specific emphasis on the lessons learnt, current outcomes and future prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.