ArticleBiomedicine hub
Severe Emphysema Treated with Bilateral Lung Sealant: A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up.
Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) for emphysematous hyperinflation has evolved during the last two decades as an alternative to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) with lower morbidity and mortality. Emphysematous lung sealant (ELS) is a form of BLVR specifically aimed at patients with collateral ventilation (CV), shown to have favorable outcomes in lung function up to two years. This case series presents four emphysema patients treated bilaterally with ELS, with a follow-up period up to six years. Two of the patients had previously undergone LVRS and BLVR with valves. Following ELS installment, all patients showed positive changes in spirometric values, with varying durability between one and five years. Three patients reported an overall improvement in subjective symptoms after treatment as measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), one of which had lasting improvement even after five years (CAT from 20 to 13). Two of the four treated patients suffered recurrent respiratory exacerbations and pneumonias requiring hospitalization. They both went on to receive lung transplantation within one and three years. This report concludes that ELS has a meaningful effect on reducing hyperinflation in emphysema with improving pulmonary function tests, and relieving symptoms of dyspnea for up to five years. Unfortunately, some patients develop complications leading to recurrent exacerbations. We were not able to show a survival benefit with ELS treatment. This article highlights the need for further research in order to predict who will benefit from this treatment and how to handle CV-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.