Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405231›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of midwifery2023

Opening Pandora's box: A meta-ethnography about alcohol use in pregnancy from midwives' and other healthcare providers' perspectives.

Bente Dahl, Aud Johannessen, Terese Bondas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of midwifery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bente DahlFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Aud JohannessenNorwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Terese BondasFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlcohol consumption has increased in recent years, including among women of childbearing age. A woman's alcohol intake during pregnancy is linked to complications and injuries in the newborn, and the risk of the child being harmed by the mother's alcohol use increases in proportion to the amount of alcohol she consumes. This meta-ethnography aims to explore midwives' and other healthcare providers' experiences of screening pregnant women for alcohol use in pregnancy and counselling them on the subject.

methodsA systematic literature search in CINAHL, Maternity & Infant Care, MEDLINE, and Scopus was conducted in August 2021 and updated in January 2023. The CASP checklist was used to assess the included articles and meta-ethnography was used to synthesize the data.

resultsFourteen qualitative studies were included. In the synthesis, we use the metaphor of Pandora's box to deepen our understanding of the topic. We found that some healthcare providers tiptoe around the box, not wanting to face the consequences and responsibilities of asking women about their alcohol use. Others refuse or are reluctant to open the box because they lack knowledge about screening and counselling. Some eventually open the box, understanding the importance of establishing a trusting relationship to address alcohol use and seeing the need for knowledge and screening tools.

conclusionsHealthcare education has the important task of ensuring that healthcare personnel have sufficient evidence-based knowledge about alcohol use in pregnancy. In the future, a health-promoting, tailored approach offering women in pre-pregnancy and early pregnancy sufficient evidence-based information should be implemented.

Indexed as

alcoholantenatal carehealthcare providermeta-ethnographymidwifepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37405231
PMCPMC10316433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.