Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405180›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023

Changes in pulmonary function following thoracic spine manipulation in a healthy inactive older adult population-a pilot study.

Holly Jonely, Dhinu Jayaseelan, Ellen Costello, Joseph Signorino, Liana Wooten, Donal Murray, Josh Woolstenhulme

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Holly JonelyThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Dhinu JayaseelanThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Ellen CostelloThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Joseph SignorinoThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Liana WootenDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Tufts University, USA.
Donal MurrayThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Josh WoolstenhulmeThe School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Physical Therapy & Health Care Sciences, The George Washington University: 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 2000, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
George Washington University · USShenandoah University · USTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Pulmonary function pathology is primarily treated pharmacologically, with a range of medication side effects. Few studies have systematically examined non-pharmacologic approaches such as joint manipulation effects on pulmonary function. This study examined the immediate and short-term effects of thoracic manipulation on pulmonary function. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-one physically inactive otherwise healthy participants aged 50 years or older were randomly assigned to either receive three sessions of thoracic manipulation (n=10) or three sessions of "sham intercostal training" (n=11). Outcome measures included forced vital capacity, maximal voluntary ventilation and thoracic excursion during maximal inhalation and exhalation. [Results] There was a statistically significant difference in maximal voluntary ventilation in the manipulation group, when measured within a week of the third intervention session and immediate effects in thoracic excursion during exhalation in the sham group following a single intervention session. There were no significant changes in other measures. [Conclusion] Spinal manipulation had no immediate effect on pulmonary function, however, affected an improvement in maximal voluntary ventilation within 7 days following a third session. The sham intervention showed a change in thoracic excursion during exhalation after the first session. Future research is necessary to further explore the relationship between thoracic manipulation and pulmonary function.

Indexed as

Physical therapyPulmonary functionSpinal-manipulation

Identifiers

PMID37405180
PMCPMC10315198
OpenAlexW4382652705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.