ArticleCureus2023
Early Management of Paediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures in a Busy District General Hospital Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study and Audit of BOAST Guidelines.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The Children's Urgent Reduction of Forearm Fractures in the Emergency Department (CURFFED) project : a national prospective trainee-led collaborative audit of practice.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Pediatric wrist fractures: variations in management across countries. An evidence-based summary of evidence.British medical bulletin · 2024Review
- Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on hospitalisations at a paediatric traumatology department during 2020: a single-centre observational study and comprehensive literature review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn response to the strain that the COVID-19 pandemic put on hospitals in the UK, the British Orthopaedic Association, in May 2021, set out British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines for the early management of distal forearm fractures in children. Following this, a local pathway was introduced at our Trust to manage these injuries in the Emergency Department (ED). The aim of this audit was to monitor compliance with the BOAST guidelines and compare the practice with a similar pre-COVID cohort.
methodsA fixed-date retrospective cohort study was conducted that included cases that presented to the emergency department during a six-month period (August 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022). Data was analysed for rates of primary ED manipulation, documentation of consent and neurovascular status in the notes, orthogonal X-ray data, time till the clinic follow-up, theatre time saved and complications. The ED fracture manipulation rate was also compared with another similar pre-COVID cohort (August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020) to look for any improvement in the practice.
resultsA total of 86.31% cases were found to have primary fracture manipulation in the ED following the introduction of Trust guidelines in accordance with the BOAST recommendations. This is an improvement in comparison to the 31.94% fracture manipulation rate before the COVID pandemic.
conclusionImplementation of the Trust pathway in accordance with the BOAST guidelines along with staff education has standardized the practice at our Trust. It saved approximately 63 hours of trauma theatre time for the six-month data collection period. Our findings also suggest that this has favourable outcomes for the patients with no complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.