ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023
Use of thoracic ultrasound in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Light therapy in medicine: where do we stand?Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Combined diaphragm and lung ultrasound profiling in healthy full-term neonates: a study of early postnatal function.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Electronic Stethoscope Auscultation and Echocardiography in ARDS: Correlation and Prognostic Value for Mortality and ICU Length of Stay: A Prospective Observational Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- The role of thoracic ultrasound in fluid management in critical care: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Lung ultrasound score as a tool to assess pulmonary ventilation and disease severity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Establishment of seven lung ultrasound phenotypes: a retrospective observational study of an LUS registry.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Observational
- Article
- Lung ultrasound and supine chest X-ray use in modern adult intensive care: mapping 30 years of advancement (1993-2023).The ultrasound journal · 2024Review
- Preface on highlights in anesthesia and critical care medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, yet it is often underrecognized. Current imaging techniques, such as CT scan and X-ray, have several limitations, including inter-observer reliability, limited accessibility, radiation and the need for transportation. Ultrasound has become an essential bedside tool in the critical care setting and the emergency room, offering several advantages over traditional imaging techniques. It is nowadays widely used for diagnosis and early management of acute respiratory and circulatory failure. Lung ultrasound (LUS) provides non-invasively valuable information regarding lung aeration, ventilation distribution and respiratory complications in ARDS patients at the bedside. Moreover, a holistic ultrasound approach, combining LUS, echocardiography, and diaphragm ultrasound offers physiological information that could help the clinician to personalize ventilator settings and guide fluid resuscitation in these patients. Ultrasound techniques could also inform about possible causes of weaning failure in difficult-to-wean patients. However, it is uncertain whether clinical decisions based on ultrasound assessment can improve outcomes in ARDS patients and this clinical approach requires further investigation. In this article, we review the use of thoracic ultrasound, including lung and diaphragm examination, for the clinical assessment of patients with ARDS, and discuss its limitations and future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.