ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Evaluation of fMRI activation in post-stroke patients with movement disorders after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Dual-Site Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Upper-Limb Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation regulates brain functional network dynamics in stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Neural mechanisms underlying the improvement of gait disturbances in stroke patients through robot-assisted gait training based on QEEG and fNIRS: a randomized controlled study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulating supplementary motor area in stroke rehabilitation: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
- Toward Precision Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Medicine: Integrating Molecular, Imaging, and Computational Biomarkers for Functional Outcome Prediction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in transcranial magnetic stimulation for psychological symptom management in Parkinson's disease.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Lethal Interactions of neuronal networks in epilepsy mediated by both synaptic and volume transmission indicate approaches to prevention.Progress in neurobiology · 2025Review
- Recent Trends in Physical Therapy Interventions and Neuromodulation Techniques to Improve Neurorehabilitation.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy combined in the treatment of post-stroke movement disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Movement disorders are one of the most common stroke residual effects, which cause a major stress on their families and society. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could change neuroplasticity, which has been suggested as an alternative rehabilitative treatment for enhancing stroke recovery. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a promising tool to explore neural mechanisms underlying rTMS intervention. Object: Our primary goal is to better understand the neuroplastic mechanisms of rTMS in stroke rehabilitation, this paper provides a scoping review of recent studies, which investigate the alteration of brain activity using fMRI after the application of rTMS over the primary motor area (M1) in movement disorders patients after stroke. Method: The database PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, WanFang Chinese database, ZhiWang Chinese database from establishment of each database until December 2022 were included. Two researchers reviewed the study, collected the information and the relevant characteristic extracted to a summary table. Two researchers also assessed the quality of literature with the Downs and Black criteria. When the two researchers unable to reach an agreement, a third researcher would have been consulted. Results: Seven hundred and eleven studies in all were discovered in the databases, and nine were finally enrolled. They were of good quality or fair quality. The literature mainly involved the therapeutic effect and imaging mechanisms of rTMS on improving movement disorders after stroke. In all of them, there was improvement of the motor function post-rTMS treatment. Both high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS) can induce increased functional connectivity, which may not directly correspond to the impact of rTMS on the activation of the stimulated brain areas. Comparing real rTMS with sham group, the neuroplastic effect of real rTMS can lead to better functional connectivity in the brain network in assisting stroke recovery. Conclusion: rTMS allows the excitation and synchronization of neural activity, promotes the reorganization of brain function, and achieves the motor function recovery. fMRI can observe the influence of rTMS on brain networks and reveal the neuroplasticity mechanism of post-stroke rehabilitation. The scoping review helps us to put forward a series of recommendations that might guide future researchers exploring the effect of motor stroke treatments on brain connectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.