Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404861›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2023

Effect of the SPRING home visits intervention on early child development and growth in rural India and Pakistan: parallel cluster randomised controlled trials.

Betty R Kirkwood, Siham Sikander, Reetabrata Roy, Seyi Soremekun, Sunil S Bhopal, Bilal Avan, Raghu Lingam, Lu Gram, Seeba Amenga-Etego, Bushra Khan and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Betty R KirkwoodDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Siham SikanderDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Reetabrata RoyDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Seyi SoremekunDepartment of Infection Biology, Faculty of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sunil S BhopalDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Bilal AvanDepartment of Infection Biology, Faculty of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Raghu LingamPopulation Child Health Research Group, School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Seeba Amenga-EtegoKintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo, Ghana.
Bushra KhanDepartment of Psychology, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Sarmad AzizDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Divya KumarChild Development Group, Sangath, New Delhi, India.
Deepali VermaChild Development Group, Sangath, New Delhi, India.
Kamal Kant SharmaChild Development Group, Sangath, New Delhi, India.
Satya Narayan PanchalChild Development Group, Sangath, New Delhi, India.
Shamsa ZafarFazaia Medical College, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jolene SkordisInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Neha BaturaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Assad HafeezWorld Health Organization, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gauri DivanChild Development Group, Sangath, New Delhi, India.
Atif RahmanDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Almost 250 million children fail to achieve their full growth or developmental potential, trapping them in a cycle of continuing disadvantage. Strong evidence exists that parent-focussed face to face interventions can improve developmental outcomes; the challenge is delivering these on a wide scale. SPRING (Sustainable Programme Incorporating Nutrition and Games) aimed to address this by developing a feasible affordable programme of monthly home visits by community-based workers (CWs) and testing two different delivery models at scale in a programmatic setting. In Pakistan, SPRING was embedded into existing monthly home visits of Lady Health Workers (LHWs). In India, it was delivered by a civil society/non-governmental organisation (CSO/NGO) that trained a new cadre of CWs. Methods: The SPRING interventions were evaluated through parallel cluster randomised trials. In Pakistan, clusters were 20 Union Councils (UCs), and in India, the catchment areas of 24 health sub-centres. Trial participants were mother-baby dyads of live born babies recruited through surveillance systems of 2 monthly home visits. Primary outcomes were BSID-III composite scores for psychomotor, cognitive and language development plus height for age Results: 1,443 children in India were assessed at age 18 months and 1,016 in Pakistan. There was no impact in either setting on ECD outcomes or growth. The percentage of children in the SPRING intervention group who were receiving diets at 12 months of age that met the WHO minimum acceptable criteria was 35% higher in India (95% CI: 4-75%, Discussion: The lack of impact is explained by shortcomings in implementation factors. Important lessons were learnt. Integrating additional tasks into the already overloaded workload of CWs is unlikely to be successful without additional resources and re-organisation of their goals to include the new tasks. The NGO model is the most likely for scale-up as few countries have established infrastructures like the LHW programme. It will require careful attention to the establishment of strong administrative and management systems to support its implementation.

Indexed as

child growth and nutritioncluster randomised control trialcommunity health worker (CHW)early child development (ECD)home visitsIndianurturing carePakistan

Identifiers

PMID37404861
PMCPMC10315474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.