ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Treatment Effects by Smoking Status for NSCLC Therapies (2010-2023): A Meta-Analysis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Real-World Data on the Effectiveness of Immunotherapy on Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Real-World Survival Outcomes of Patients With High PD-L1 Advanced NSCLC Who Received Chemoimmunotherapy Versus Immunotherapy.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment may improve clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with bone metastases.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Machine learning-guided single-cell multiomics uncovers GDF15-driven immunosuppressive niches in NSCLC: A translational framework for overcoming anti-PD-1 resistance.Translational oncology · 2025Article
- Improvement of survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study evaluating the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Real-world evidence for pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: a nationwide cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- The efficacy of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Real-world treatment patterns, biomarker testing, and clinical outcomes of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the immunotherapy era.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Checkpoint based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy alone (mono-IT) or combined with chemotherapy (chemo-IT) has recently become the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Here, real-world outcomes of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT of advanced NSCLC treated within routine clinical practice at a single academic center in the Central Eastern European (CEE) region are presented. Materials and methods: A total of 176 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with mono-IT (118 patients) or chemo-IT (58 patients) were included. At the participating institution, all medical data relevant for providing oncology care are collected prospectively and in a standardized manner using purposely created pro-forms. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (mOS) and median duration of treatment (mDOT). Results: The 118 patients in the mono-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (59%), 20% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 14% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a median follow-up time (mFU) of 24.1 months, the mOS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 11.1-27.6), and the mDOT was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5). The 1-year OS was 62%. The 58 patients in the chemo-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (64%), 9% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 7% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a mFU of 15.5 months, the mOS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 15.9-26.7), and the mDOT was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.6). The 1-year OS was 75%. Adverse events of severe grade were recorded in 18% and 26% of patients, and immunotherapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 19% and 9% in the mono-IT and chemo-IT groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were recorded. Conclusion: The results from the present real-world observational study from a CEE country suggest similar effectiveness and safety of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT in patients with advanced NSCLC to those observed in randomized clinical trials. However, continuous follow-up will offer better insight into the magnitude of long-term benefits in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.