ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Comparison of Void Formation Between Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and AH Plus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Assessing Sealing Ability of C-Root SP Strontium Silicate Sealer With Different Obturation Techniques: An in vitro Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- The effect of moisture conditions and canal morphologies on the filling quality of iRoot SP with single-cone technique in root canals: anFrontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Integrated Endodontic and Restorative Management of C-Shaped Canals with Severe Coronal Loss in Mandibular Second Molar: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
- Comparative analysis between resin-based root canal sealer and recent bioceramic-based root canal sealers using MicroCT, film thickness, and solubility.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Sealing ability in root canal obturation has always been a key concern for endodontic success. The purpose of this study was to analyze the percentage of voids in root canal space obturated by using single cone hydraulic condensation with different root canal sealers and to compare those with AH Plus sealer. Materials and methods: Experiments were conducted using twenty 3D-printed upper first premolars. After the buccal root canals were prepared using Ni-Ti rotary instruments, the teeth were divided into four groups: the AH Plus, BC sealer, BC sealer HiFlow, and Endoseal MTA groups. All buccal canals were obturated by single-cone hydraulic condensation. All specimens were scanned using micro-computed tomography and the percentage volume of the voids inside and outside the filled materials (V Results: The results indicated that most of the voids were presented near the interface (V Conclusion: For the percentage volume of voids between the root canal filling material and root canal surface, though the BC sealer Hiflow is slightly larger than Endoseal MTA, which is still much less than BC sealer and AH Plus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.