ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Correlation between facial asymmetry of skeletal class III jaw relationship and morphology of the temporomandibular joint: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Preoperative Condylar Volume on Postoperative Displacement in Asymmetric Mandibular Setback Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional analysis of condylar displacement after orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery for Facial Asymmetry with Near-Normal Sagittal Relationship: Mid-Term Stability and Remodeling.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Relationships Among Non-Functional Occlusal Habits, Temporomandibular Disorder Symptoms, and Skeletal Morphology in Patients with Dentofacial Deformities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cranial Vault Deformation and Its Association with Mandibular Deviation in Patients with Facial Asymmetry: A CT-Based Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of upper airway and temporomandibular joint changes in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, treated with the Twin Block appliance: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Changes of temporomandibular joint space volume during 1 year after transoral vertical ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular asymmetry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The cranium from the Octagon in Ephesos.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Relationship between Bilateral Landmarks of Facial Asymmetry in Skeletal Class II and Class III in Vertical Dimension: 3D Facial Scan and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Tomographic assessment of glenoid fossa morphology and position in symmetric and asymmetric patients.Science progressObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Facial asymmetry is a common dentofacial deformity especially in skeletal Class III jaw relation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the condylefossa relationship of Taiwanese people in skeletal Class III jaw relation with or without facial asymmetry by CBCT image. Materials and methods: CBCT images were collected from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and then divided into symmetric Class III group (Menton [Mn] deviation ≦ 4 mm) and asymmetric Class III group (Menton [Mn] deviation > 4 mm). Maxilla deviation, upper and lower dental midline deviation, joint space, condylar axial angle and condylar volume was measured. Independent t test was used for comparison between groups, and paired t test was applied for comparison between both condyles within each group. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between skeletal midline deviations and joint morphology. Results: No significant difference was found in joint space between groups or between sides within each group, but we can find a significant difference in axial condylar angle easurement which was greater on the non-deviation side of condyle. Significant lesser condylar volume was also found on the deviation side in asymmetric group. There had a significant positive correlation between Mn point deviation, geometric center difference and condylar volume ratio. Conclusion: These results demonstrated that in the side with greater mandibular growth potential, the axis rotation in axial plane would be greater. In the side with lesser mandibular growth potential, the total condyle volume would be lesser, even though with large variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.