ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Implant stability and marginal bone level changes: A 2-year prospective pilot study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Comparison of primary and secondary stability of a one-piece compressive conometric implant system in the posterior upper and lower jaws.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of Implant Stability According to Implant Placement Site and Duration in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Multi-Center Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Implant stability is crucial for successful osseointegration. Marginal bone level is considered an important indicator of long-term implant success and stability. The purposes of this study were to investigate 1) the effect of age, gender, bone density, implant length, and implant diameter on insertion torque (IT), primary implant stability quotient (ISQ), and secondary ISQ, 2) the impact of age, gender, bone density, implant length, implant diameter, IT, and ISQ on marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and methods: Ninety patients who needed implant therapy were enrolled and overall 156 implants were installed to support single crowns. IT and ISQ were recorded for all implants during surgery and ISQ measurements were performed at follow-up visits. Age, gender, bone density, implant length and diameter were also registered. Radiographic evaluation of MBL was performed postoperative immediate (baseline), 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months using digital periapical radiographs. Results: Age had little effect on IT and primary ISQ ( Conclusion: Implant diameter had a more profound impact than length on IT/primary ISQ. Bone density played a considerable role in IT/primary ISQ determination. Bone density and IT had more impacts than primary ISQ on MBL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.