Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Living yeast-based biostimulants: different genes for the same results?

Marie Chambard, Benjamin Albert, Mickaël Cadiou, Sarah Auby, Camille Profizi, Isabelle Boulogne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie ChambardUniv Rouen Normandie, GLYCOMEV UR 4358, SFR Normandie Végétal FED 4277, Innovation Chimie Carnot, IRIB, Rouen, France.
Benjamin AlbertAgrauxine by Lesaffre, Beaucouzé, France.
Mickaël CadiouAgrauxine by Lesaffre, Beaucouzé, France.
Sarah AubyAgrauxine by Lesaffre, Beaucouzé, France.
Camille ProfiziAgrauxine by Lesaffre, Beaucouzé, France.
Isabelle BoulogneUniv Rouen Normandie, GLYCOMEV UR 4358, SFR Normandie Végétal FED 4277, Innovation Chimie Carnot, IRIB, Rouen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, many products are available in the plant biostimulants market. Among them, living yeast-based biostimulants are also commercialized. Given the living aspect of these last products, the reproducibility of their effects should be investigated to ensure end-users' confidence. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of a living yeast-based biostimulant between two different soybean cultures. These two cultures named C1 and C2 were conducted on the same variety and soil but in different locations and dates until the VC developmental stage (unifoliate leaves unrolled), with

Indexed as

abiotic stress tolerancecell wall and carbohydrate synthesisreproducibilityRNAseqsaccharomyces cerevisiaeseed coatingsoybean

Identifiers

PMID37404542
PMCPMC10315835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.