ArticleCureus2023
Neuropsychiatric Effects in Patients With Invasive Prolactinomas Treated With Cabergoline.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Invasive prolactinoma accounts for 1-5% of all prolactinomas. Its mass and compromise of the diencephalon and frontal and temporal lobes may result in a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms that are often missed during initial evaluations. Cabergoline is a dopaminergic agonist used as the first-line treatment for these patients; however, its effect on neuropsychiatric symptoms in this particular setting remains unexplored. In this study, our primary objective was to describe the epidemiology of neuropsychiatric comorbidities in Mexican patients with invasive prolactinomas. The secondary aim of the study was to describe how these comorbidities are modified by treatment with cabergoline, through follow-up with standardized clinical scales. Methods This was a retrospective analytic study. Data were pulled from clinical records and evaluations of patients at baseline and at six-month follow-ups. Results A total of 10 patients were included in the study. None of them had any prior psychiatric diagnosis. At the initial evaluation, 70% were diagnosed with depression or anxiety. During follow-up, two patients developed neuropsychiatric symptoms; there was a significant reduction in tumor size but no difference was found in clinimetric scores for neuropsychiatric comorbidities. Conclusions Patients with giant prolactinomas may present with several neuropsychiatric symptoms throughout the course of their disease. Although there are several mechanisms involved, it is important to keep in mind that cabergoline may interfere with the dopaminergic pathways involved. This study was underpowered to determine the association but can serve as a pilot for further research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.