Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404324›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2023

Diabetes Detection Models in Mexican Patients by Combining Machine Learning Algorithms and Feature Selection Techniques for Clinical and Paraclinical Attributes: A Comparative Evaluation.

Antonio García-Domínguez, Carlos E Galván-Tejada, Rafael Magallanes-Quintanar, Hamurabi Gamboa-Rosales, Irma González Curiel, Jesús Peralta-Romero, Miguel Cruz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-Specific Ensemble Models for Type 2 Diabetes Classification in the Mexican Population.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonio García-DomínguezAcademic Unit of Electrical Engineering, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Juárez Garden 147, Downtown, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-2029
Carlos E Galván-TejadaAcademic Unit of Electrical Engineering, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Juárez Garden 147, Downtown, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-4687
Rafael Magallanes-QuintanarAcademic Unit of Electrical Engineering, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Juárez Garden 147, Downtown, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-3275
Hamurabi Gamboa-RosalesAcademic Unit of Electrical Engineering, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Juárez Garden 147, Downtown, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9498-6602
Irma González CurielAcademic Unit of Chemical Sciences, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Juarez Garden 147, Downtown, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0044-9196
Jesús Peralta-RomeroMedical Research Unit in Biochemistry, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI, Mexican Social Security Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-5555
Miguel CruzMedical Research Unit in Biochemistry, Specialties Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI, Mexican Social Security Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9985-6172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of medical diagnostic models to support healthcare professionals has witnessed remarkable growth in recent years. Among the prevalent health conditions affecting the global population, diabetes stands out as a significant concern. In the domain of diabetes diagnosis, machine learning algorithms have been widely explored for generating disease detection models, leveraging diverse datasets primarily derived from clinical studies. The performance of these models heavily relies on the selection of the classifier algorithm and the quality of the dataset. Therefore, optimizing the input data by selecting relevant features becomes essential for accurate classification. This research presents a comprehensive investigation into diabetes detection models by integrating two feature selection techniques: the Akaike information criterion and genetic algorithms. These techniques are combined with six prominent classifier algorithms, including support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting, extra trees, and naive Bayes. By leveraging clinical and paraclinical features, the generated models are evaluated and compared to existing approaches. The results demonstrate superior performance, surpassing accuracies of 94%. Furthermore, the use of feature selection techniques allows for working with a reduced dataset. The significance of feature selection is underscored in this study, showcasing its pivotal role in enhancing the performance of diabetes detection models. By judiciously selecting relevant features, this approach contributes to the advancement of medical diagnostic capabilities and empowers healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding diabetes diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes MellitusBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID37404324
PMCPMC10317588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.