ArticleJournal of diabetes research2023
Diabetes Detection Models in Mexican Patients by Combining Machine Learning Algorithms and Feature Selection Techniques for Clinical and Paraclinical Attributes: A Comparative Evaluation.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-Specific Ensemble Models for Type 2 Diabetes Classification in the Mexican Population.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for knee osteoarthritis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Setting Ranges in Potential Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Early Detection By Sex-An Approach with Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimizing Clinical Diabetes Diagnosis through Generative Adversarial Networks: Evaluation and Validation.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of Dementia & Mild Cognitive Impairment in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of medical diagnostic models to support healthcare professionals has witnessed remarkable growth in recent years. Among the prevalent health conditions affecting the global population, diabetes stands out as a significant concern. In the domain of diabetes diagnosis, machine learning algorithms have been widely explored for generating disease detection models, leveraging diverse datasets primarily derived from clinical studies. The performance of these models heavily relies on the selection of the classifier algorithm and the quality of the dataset. Therefore, optimizing the input data by selecting relevant features becomes essential for accurate classification. This research presents a comprehensive investigation into diabetes detection models by integrating two feature selection techniques: the Akaike information criterion and genetic algorithms. These techniques are combined with six prominent classifier algorithms, including support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting, extra trees, and naive Bayes. By leveraging clinical and paraclinical features, the generated models are evaluated and compared to existing approaches. The results demonstrate superior performance, surpassing accuracies of 94%. Furthermore, the use of feature selection techniques allows for working with a reduced dataset. The significance of feature selection is underscored in this study, showcasing its pivotal role in enhancing the performance of diabetes detection models. By judiciously selecting relevant features, this approach contributes to the advancement of medical diagnostic capabilities and empowers healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding diabetes diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.