ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Cost-effectiveness of Paxlovid in reducing severe COVID-19 and mortality in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of Emerging and Existing Pre-prophylaxis and Therapeutic Options for COVID-19 in Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Pooled it
- Lessons Learned from Model-based Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Drug Treatments Under Pandemic Circumstances: Results from a Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Pooled it
- Azvudine for COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Real-World Observational Study of Long-Term Renal Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Economic Evaluation of Oral Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir for COVID-19 in Higher Risk Outpatients.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Observational Study on COVID-19 Patients Receiving Treatment with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (PAXLOVID).Pulmonary therapy · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of deucravacitinib versus apremilast of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Effect of immune infiltration intensity on the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Utility of ISARIC 4C Mortality Score, Vaccination History, and Anti-S Antibody Titre in Predicting Risk of Severe COVID-19.Viruses · 2024Article
- Economic Evaluation of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Among Adults Against Hospitalization During the Omicron Dominated Period in Malaysia: A Real-World Evidence Perspective.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2024Article
- Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Methyltransferase Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 nsp14 and nsp16.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Topic and Trend Analysis of Weibo Discussions About COVID-19 Medications Before and After China's Exit from the Zero-COVID Policy: Retrospective Infoveillance Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of Paxlovid in reducing severe COVID-19 and its associated morality, and to investigate the affordable price of Paxlovid in China. Materials and methods: Using a Markov model, two interventions by Paxlovid prescription (with and without prescription) were compared in terms of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes and economic loss. COVID-related costs were collected from the societal perspective. Effectiveness data were obtained from literature. The primary outcomes were total social cost, disability adjusted life-years (DALYs) and net monetary benefit (NMB). Scenario analyses were performed to investigate the affordable price of Paxlovid in China. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to verify the model robustness. Results: Compared with the non-Paxlovid cohort, the NMBs of the Paxlovid cohort were only higher in the subgroup of patients aged over 80 years old, regardless of their vaccination status. Our scenario analysis found that, the price ceiling of Paxlovid/box for it to be cost-effective was RMB 8,993 (8,970-9,009) in those aged over 80 years old who were not vaccinated, which is the highest; and was RMB 35 (27-45) in those aged 40-59 years old who were vaccinated, which is the lowest. Sensitivity analyses found that the incremental NMB for the vaccinated people aged over 80 years was most sensitive to the efficacy of Paxlovid and the cost-effectiveness probability of Paxlovid increased with its decreasing price. Conclusion: Under the current marketing price of Paxlovid/box (RMB 1,890), using Paxlovid was only cost-effective in people aged over 80 years old regardless of their vaccination status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.