Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404197›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2023

Addressing the Clinical Importance of Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters in Drug Discovery and Development.

Raymond K Hau, Stephen H Wright, Nathan J Cherrington

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ToxPoint: The case for Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters in current regulatory guidance.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raymond K HauDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5464-8388
Stephen H WrightDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Nathan J CherringtonDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-8140
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Training in Environmental Toxicology of Human DiseaseT32ES007091 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Nathan J Cherrington · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
Circumventing the Blood-Testis BarrierR01GM123643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CHERRINGTON, NATHAN J · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
Improving In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation for Renal Cationic Drug TransportR01GM129777 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI WRIGHT, STEPHEN H · 2018 to 2019
$614k
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007091NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) guidances on small-molecule drug-drug interactions (DDIs), with input from the International Transporter Consortium (ITC), recommend the evaluation of nine drug transporters. Although other clinically relevant drug uptake and efflux transporters have been discussed in ITC white papers, they have been excluded from further recommendation by the ITC and are not included in current regulatory guidances. These include the ubiquitously expressed equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) 1 and ENT2, which have been recognized by the ITC for their potential role in clinically relevant nucleoside analog drug interactions for patients with cancer. Although there is comparatively limited clinical evidence supporting their role in DDI risk or other adverse drug reactions (ADRs) compared with the nine highlighted transporters, several in vitro and in vivo studies have identified ENT interactions with non-nucleoside/non-nucleotide drugs, in addition to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. Some noteworthy examples of compounds that interact with ENTs include cannabidiol and selected protein kinase inhibitors, as well as the nucleoside analogs remdesivir, EIDD-1931, gemcitabine, and fialuridine. Consequently, DDIs involving the ENTs may be responsible for therapeutic inefficacy or off-target toxicity. Evidence suggests that ENT1 and ENT2 should be considered as transporters potentially involved in clinically relevant DDIs and ADRs, thereby warranting further investigation and regulatory consideration.

Indexed as

Clinical RelevanceEquilibrative-Nucleoside Transporter 2Biological TransportDrug DiscoveryHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsEquilibrative-Nucleoside Transporter 2Membrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37404197
PMCPMC11347013
OpenAlexW4383186505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.