Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404112›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2023

Developing and Evaluating Deep Learning Algorithms for Object Detection: Key Points for Achieving Superior Model Performance.

Jang-Hoon Oh, Hyug-Gi Kim, Kyung Mi Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jang-Hoon Oh *Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-5470
Hyug-Gi Kim *Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-9531
Kyung Mi LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bandilee@khu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-3424-0208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence, especially object detection-based deep learning in computer vision, has made significant advancements, driven by the development of computing power and the widespread use of graphic processor units. Object detection-based deep learning techniques have been applied in various fields, including the medical imaging domain, where remarkable achievements have been reported in disease detection. However, the application of deep learning does not always guarantee satisfactory performance, and researchers have been employing trial-and-error to identify the factors contributing to performance degradation and enhance their models. Moreover, due to the black-box problem, the intermediate processes of a deep learning network cannot be comprehended by humans; as a result, identifying problems in a deep learning model that exhibits poor performance can be challenging. This article highlights potential issues that may cause performance degradation at each deep learning step in the medical imaging domain and discusses factors that must be considered to improve the performance of deep learning models. Researchers who wish to begin deep learning research can reduce the required amount of trial-and-error by understanding the issues discussed in this study.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansData augmentationDeep learningDeep learning workflowDisease subclassDiseases with small sizesHyperparameter optimizationImage modalityObject detection

Identifiers

PMID37404112
PMCPMC10323413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.