Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37404106›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2023

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluating Residual Breast Tissue After Robotic-Assisted Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women With Early Breast Cancer.

Wen-Pei Wu, Hung-Wen Lai, Chiung-Ying Liao, Joseph Lin, Hsin-I Huang, Shou-Tung Chen, Chen-Te Chou, Dar-Ren Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Pei WuDepartment of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-160X
Hung-Wen LaiKaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-2013
Chiung-Ying LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-0878
Joseph LinDivision of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-816X
Hsin-I HuangDepartment of Information Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-491X
Shou-Tung ChenDivision of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-6963
Chen-Te ChouDepartment of Radiology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1879-8105
Dar-Ren ChenDivision of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0897-4374
Changhua Christian Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProspective studies on postoperative residual breast tissue (RBT) after robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) for breast cancer are limited. RBT presents an unknown risk of local recurrence or the development of new cancer after curative or risk-reducing mastectomies. This study investigated the technical feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate RBT after R-NSM in women with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective pilot study, 105 patients, who underwent R-NSM for breast cancer at Changhua Christian Hospital between March 2017 and May 2022, were subjected to postoperative breast MRI to evaluate the presence and location of RBT. The postoperative MRI scans of 43 patients (age, 47.8 ± 8.5 years), with existing preoperative MRI scans, were evaluated for the presence and location of RBT. In total, 54 R-NSM procedures were performed. In parallel, we reviewed the literature on RBT after nipple-sparing mastectomy, considering its prevalence.

resultsRBT was detected in 7 (13.0%) of the 54 mastectomies (6 of the 48 therapeutic mastectomies and 1 of the 6 prophylactic mastectomies). The most common location for RBT was behind the nipple-areolar complex (5 of 7 [71.4%]). Another RBT was found in the upper inner quadrant (2 of 7 [28.6%]). Among the six patients who underwent RBT after therapeutic mastectomies, one patient developed a local recurrence of the skin flap. The other five patients with RBT after therapeutic mastectomies remained disease-free.

conclusionR-NSM, a surgical innovation, does not seem to increase the prevalence of RBT, and breast MRI showed feasibility as a noninvasive imaging tool for evaluating the presence and location of RBT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomyMiddle AgedNipplesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Local recurrenceResidual breast tissue (RBT)Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM)

Identifiers

PMID37404106
PMCPMC10323414
OpenAlexW4382519441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.