Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403598›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Dissecting unsupervised learning through hidden Markov modeling in electrophysiological data.

Laura Masaracchia, Felipe Fredes, Mark W Woolrich, Diego Vidaurre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Gaussian-linear hidden Markov model: A Python package.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trial-by-trial detection of cognitive events in neural time-series.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura MasaracchiaCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-6183
Felipe FredesCenter for Proteins in Memory, Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-2014
Mark W WoolrichPsychiatry Department, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Diego VidaurreCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106183/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 215573/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unsupervised, data-driven methods are commonly used in neuroscience to automatically decompose data into interpretable patterns. These patterns differ from one another depending on the assumptions of the models. How these assumptions affect specific data decompositions in practice, however, is often unclear, which hinders model applicability and interpretability. For instance, the hidden Markov model (HMM) automatically detects characteristic, recurring activity patterns (so-called states) from time series data. States are defined by a certain probability distribution, whose state-specific parameters are estimated from the data. But what specific features, from all of those that the data contain, do the states capture? That depends on the choice of probability distribution and on other model hyperparameters. Using both synthetic and real data, we aim to better characterize the behavior of two HMM types that can be applied to electrophysiological data. Specifically, we study which differences in data features (such as frequency, amplitude, or signal-to-noise ratio) are more salient to the models and therefore more likely to drive the state decomposition. Overall, we aim at providing guidance for the appropriate use of this type of analysis on one- or two-channel neural electrophysiological data and an informed interpretation of its results given the characteristics of the data and the purpose of the analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsUnsupervised Machine LearningMarkov ChainsProbabilityelectrophysiologyfrequency analysishidden Markov modelmodel selectionunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37403598
PMCPMC10625837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.