Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403408›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Nonequilibrium Self-Assembly Time Forecasting by the Stochastic Landscape Method.

Michael Faran, Gili Bisker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coarse-Graining Self-Assembly by the Stochastic Landscape Method.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  3. Nonequilibrium Self-Assembly Control by the Stochastic Landscape Method.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Stochastic Landscape Approach for Protein Folding State Classification.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael FaranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Gili BiskerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2592-7956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biological systems rely on the ability to self-assemble target structures from different molecular building blocks using nonequilibrium drives, stemming, for example, from chemical potential gradients. The complex interactions between the different components give rise to a rugged energy landscape with a plethora of local minima on the dynamic pathway to the target assembly. Exploring a toy physical model of multicomponents nonequilibrium self-assembly, we demonstrate that a segmented description of the system dynamics can be used to provide predictions of the first assembly times. We show that for a wide range of values of the nonequilibrium drive, a log-normal distribution emerges for the first assembly time statistics. Based on data segmentation by a Bayesian estimator of abrupt changes (BEAST), we further present a general data-based algorithmic scheme, namely, the stochastic landscape method (SLM), for assembly time predictions. We demonstrate that this scheme can be implemented for the first assembly time forecast during a nonequilibrium self-assembly process, with improved prediction power compared to a naïve guess based on the mean remaining time to the first assembly. Our results can be used to establish a general quantitative framework for nonequilibrium systems and to improve control protocols of nonequilibrium self-assembly processes.

Identifiers

PMID37403408
PMCPMC10350916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.