Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403334›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2023

Artificial neural network-based diagnostic models for lung cancer combining conventional indicators with tumor markers.

Yanan Luo, Hui Yuan, Qin Pei, Yiyu Chen, Jiawen Xian, Rongrong Du, Ting Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanan LuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.
Hui YuanDepartment of Pathophysiology, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157011, P.R. China.
Qin PeiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.
Yiyu ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.
Jiawen XianDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.
Rongrong DuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.
Ting YeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-5704-400X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study set out to establish a lung cancer diagnosis and prediction model uses conventional laboratory indicators combined with tumor markers, so as to help early screening and auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer through a convenient, fast, and cheap way, and improve the early diagnosis rate of lung cancer. A total of 221 patients with lung cancer, 100 patients with benign pulmonary diseases, and 184 healthy subjects were retrospectively studied. General clinical data, the results of conventional laboratory indicators, and tumor markers were collected. Statistical Product and Service Solutions 26.0 was used for data analysis. The diagnosis and prediction model of lung cancer was established by artificial neural network - multilayer perceptron. After correlation and difference analysis, five comparison groups (lung cancer-benign lung disease group, lung cancer-health group, benign lung disease-health group, early-stage lung cancer-benign lung disease group, and early-stage lung cancer-health group) obtained 5, 28, 25, 16, and 25 valuable indicators for predicting lung cancer or benign lung disease, and then established five diagnostic prediction models, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of each combined diagnostic prediction model (0.848, 0.989, 0.949, 0.841, and 0.976) was higher than that of the diagnostic prediction model established only using tumor markers (0.799, 0.941, 0.830, 0.661, and 0.850), and the difference in the lung cancer-health group, the benign lung disease-health group, the early-stage lung cancer-benign lung disease group, and early-stage lung cancer-health group was statistically significant (

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsHumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorArtificial neural networkscombined detectiondiagnostic modelslaboratory indicatorslung cancertumor markers

Identifiers

PMID37403334
PMCPMC10484194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.