ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Dual-tissue transplantation versus osteochondral autograft transplantation in the treatment of osteochondral defects: a porcine model study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transthoracic echocardiography in healthy Diannan small-ear pigs.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- ROS-Activated Nanohydrogel Scaffolds with Multi-Factors Controlled Release for Targeted Dual-Lineage Repair of Osteochondral Defects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Autologous osteoperiosteal transplantation achieves comparable repair effect and superior interface integration to autologous osteochondral transplantation in porcine osteochondral defects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Intra-articular injection of ascorbic acid enhances microfracture-mediated cartilage repair.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteochondral injury is a common sports injury, and hyaline cartilage does not regenerate spontaneously when injured. However, there is currently no gold standard for treating osteochondral defects. Osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) is widely used in clinical practice and is best used to treat small osteochondral lesions in the knee that are < 2 cm
methodsOsteochondral defects were made in the bilateral medial condyles of the knees of 12 Dian-nan small-ear pigs. The 24 knees were divided into the ADTT group (n = 8), OAT group (n = 8), and empty control group (n = 8). At 2 and 4 months postoperatively, the knees underwent gross evaluation based on the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score, radiographic assessment based on CT findings and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, and histological evaluation based on the O'Driscoll histological score of the repair tissue.
resultsAt 2 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score were significantly better in the OAT group than the ADTT group (all P < 0.05). At 4 months postoperatively, the ICRS score, CT evaluation, MOCART score, and O'Driscoll histological score tended to be better in the OAT group than the ADTT group, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (all P > 0.05).
conclusionsIn a porcine model, ADTT and OAT are both effective treatments for osteochondral defects in weight bearing areas. ADTT may be useful as an alternative procedure to OAT for treating osteochondral defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.