Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403155›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023

TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.

Xujun Zhang, Chao Shen, Dejun Jiang, Jintu Zhang, Qing Ye, Lei Xu, Tingjun Hou, Peichen Pan, Yu Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decision Tree for Prediction of Binding Affinity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. RankMHC: Learning to Rank Class-I Peptide-MHC Structural Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xujun ZhangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Chao ShenInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Dejun JiangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Jintu ZhangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Qing YeInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Lei XuInstitute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, 213001, China.
Tingjun HouInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.
Peichen PanInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China. panpeichen@zju.edu.cn.
Yu KangInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of, Zhejiang University, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China. yukang@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 226-2022-00220National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF1203000National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973281National Natural Science Foundation of China 82204279Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LZ19H300001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning-based scoring functions (MLSFs) have shown potential for improving virtual screening capabilities over classical scoring functions (SFs). Due to the high computational cost in the process of feature generation, the numbers of descriptors used in MLSFs and the characterization of protein-ligand interactions are always limited, which may affect the overall accuracy and efficiency. Here, we propose a new SF called TB-IECS (theory-based interaction energy component score), which combines energy terms from Smina and NNScore version 2, and utilizes the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm for model training. In this study, the energy terms decomposed from 15 traditional SFs were firstly categorized based on their formulas and physicochemical principles, and 324 feature combinations were generated accordingly. Five best feature combinations were selected for further evaluation of the model performance in regard to the selection of feature vectors with various length, interaction types and ML algorithms. The virtual screening power of TB-IECS was assessed on the datasets of DUD-E and LIT-PCBA, as well as seven target-specific datasets from the ChemDiv database. The results showed that TB-IECS outperformed classical SFs including Glide SP and Dock, and effectively balanced the efficiency and accuracy for practical virtual screening.

Indexed as

Machine learningScoring functionTheory-based interaction energy componentVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID37403155
PMCPMC10320911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.