Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37403125›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2023

Personalized nutrition therapy in critical care: 10 expert recommendations.

Paul E Wischmeyer, Danielle E Bear, Mette M Berger, Elisabeth De Waele, Jan Gunst, Stephen A McClave, Carla M Prado, Zudin Puthucheary, Emma J Ridley, Greet Van den Berghe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Core outcome sets and trials of nutrition and metabolism interventions.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Paul E WischmeyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3094 Mail # 41, 2301 Erwin Road, 5692 HAFS, Durham, NC, USA. Paul.Wischmeyer@Duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3369-7911
Danielle E BearDepartments of Nutrition and Dietetics and Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-5553
Mette M BergerFaculty of Biology & Medicine, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-1648
Elisabeth De WaeleDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5126-3500
Jan GunstClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-6393
Stephen A McClaveDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1140-7263
Carla M PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-5641
Zudin PuthuchearyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Emma J RidleyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 3, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7922-5717
Greet Van den BergheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-1362
Arthur R H van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Wageningen University & Research, Ede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-7192
KU Leuven · BEDuke University · USGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBThe Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Louisville · USVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalization of ICU nutrition is essential to future of critical care. Recommendations from American/European guidelines and practice suggestions incorporating recent literature are presented. Low-dose enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) can be started within 48 h of admission. While EN is preferred route of delivery, new data highlight PN can be given safely without increased risk; thus, when early EN is not feasible, provision of isocaloric PN is effective and results in similar outcomes. Indirect calorimetry (IC) measurement of energy expenditure (EE) is recommended by both European/American guidelines after stabilization post-ICU admission. Below-measured EE (~ 70%) targets should be used during early phase and increased to match EE later in stay. Low-dose protein delivery can be used early (~ D1-2) (< 0.8 g/kg/d) and progressed to ≥ 1.2 g/kg/d as patients stabilize, with consideration of avoiding higher protein in unstable patients and in acute kidney injury not on CRRT. Intermittent-feeding schedules hold promise for further research. Clinicians must be aware of delivered energy/protein and what percentage of targets delivered nutrition represents. Computerized nutrition monitoring systems/platforms have become widely available. In patients at risk of micronutrient/vitamin losses (i.e., CRRT), evaluation of micronutrient levels should be considered post-ICU days 5-7 with repletion of deficiencies where indicated. In future, we hope use of muscle monitors such as ultrasound, CT scan, and/or BIA will be utilized to assess nutrition risk and monitor response to nutrition. Use of specialized anabolic nutrients such as HMB, creatine, and leucine to improve strength/muscle mass is promising in other populations and deserves future study. In post-ICU setting, continued use of IC measurement and other muscle measures should be considered to guide nutrition. Research on using rehabilitation interventions such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to guide post-ICU exercise/rehabilitation prescription and using anabolic agents such as testosterone/oxandrolone to promote post-ICU recovery is needed.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsNutritional SupportCritical CareCritical IllnessEnteral NutritionHumansNutritional StatusBody compositionCritical illnessEnteral nutritionICUIndirect calorimetryMicronutrientsMuscleNutritionParenteral nutritionProteinTestosteroneTPN

Identifiers

PMID37403125
PMCPMC10318839
OpenAlexW4383187487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.