Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402835›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2023

Highly accurate and large-scale collision cross sections prediction with graph neural networks.

Renfeng Guo, Youjia Zhang, Yuxuan Liao, Qiong Yang, Ting Xie, Xiaqiong Fan, Zhonglong Lin, Yi Chen, Hongmei Lu, Zhimin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Renfeng Guo *College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China.
Youjia Zhang *School of Computer Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430074, Wuhan, China.
Yuxuan Liao *College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China.
Qiong YangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China.
Ting XieCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China.
Xiaqiong FanCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China.
Zhonglong LinYunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, 650021, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yi ChenYunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, 650021, Kunming, Yunnan, China. cytobacco007@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3828-8559
Hongmei LuCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China. hongmeilu@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4686-4491
Zhimin ZhangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, China. zmzhang@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4167-4234

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 21873116National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22273120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The collision cross section (CCS) values derived from ion mobility spectrometry can be used to improve the accuracy of compound identification. Here, we have developed the Structure included graph merging with adduct method for CCS prediction (SigmaCCS) based on graph neural networks using 3D conformers as inputs. A model was trained, evaluated, and tested with >5,000 experimental CCS values. It achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.9945 and a median relative error of 1.1751% on the test set. The model-agnostic interpretation method and the visualization of the learned representations were used to investigate the chemical rationality of SigmaCCS. An in-silico database with 282 million CCS values was generated for three different adduct types of 94 million compounds. Its source code is publicly available at https://github.com/zmzhang/SigmaCCS . Altogether, SigmaCCS is an accurate, rational, and off-the-shelf method to directly predict CCS values from molecular structures.

Identifiers

PMID37402835
PMCPMC10319785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.