Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Automated segmentation of the mandibular canal and its anterior loop by deep learning.

Nicolly Oliveira-Santos, Reinhilde Jacobs, Fernando Fortes Picoli, Pierre Lahoud, Liselot Niclaes, Francisco Carlos Groppo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolly Oliveira-SantosOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1292-3852
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium. reinhilde.jacobs@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3461-0363
Fernando Fortes PicoliOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-085X
Pierre LahoudOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5555-2185
Liselot NiclaesOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-4606
Francisco Carlos GroppoDepartment of Biosciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-773X
KU Leuven · BEUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate mandibular canal (MC) detection is crucial to avoid nerve injury during surgical procedures. Moreover, the anatomic complexity of the interforaminal region requires a precise delineation of anatomical variations such as the anterior loop (AL). Therefore, CBCT-based presurgical planning is recommended, even though anatomical variations and lack of MC cortication make canal delineation challenging. To overcome these limitations, artificial intelligence (AI) may aid presurgical MC delineation. In the present study, we aim to train and validate an AI-driven tool capable of performing accurate segmentation of the MC even in the presence of anatomical variation such as AL. Results achieved high accuracy metrics, with 0.997 of global accuracy for both MC with and without AL. The anterior and middle sections of the MC, where most surgical interventions are performed, presented the most accurate segmentation compared to the posterior section. The AI-driven tool provided accurate segmentation of the mandibular canal, even in the presence of anatomical variation such as an anterior loop. Thus, the presently validated dedicated AI tool may aid clinicians in automating the segmentation of neurovascular canals and their anatomical variations. It may significantly contribute to presurgical planning for dental implant placement, especially in the interforaminal region.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMandibular CanalArtificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyMandible

Identifiers

PMID37402784
PMCPMC10319881
OpenAlexW4383066794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.