Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402771›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

On the similarity between aortic and carotid pressure diastolic decay: a mathematical modelling study.

Vasiliki Bikia, Georgios Rovas, Sokratis Anagnostopoulos, Nikolaos Stergiopulos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vasiliki BikiaLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland. vasiliki.bikia@epfl.ch.
Georgios RovasLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sokratis AnagnostopoulosLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nikolaos StergiopulosLaboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic diastolic pressure decay (DPD) has been shown to have considerable pathophysiological relevance in the assessment of vascular health, as it is significantly affected by arterial stiffening. Nonetheless, the aortic pressure waveform is rarely available and hence the utility of the aortic DPD is limited. On the other hand, carotid blood pressure is often used as a surrogate of central (aortic) blood pressure in cardiovascular monitoring. Although the two waveforms are inherently different, it is unknown whether the aortic DPD shares a common pattern with the carotid DPD. In this study, we compared the DPD time constant of the aorta (aortic RC) and the DPD time constant of the carotid artery (carotid RC) using an in-silico-generated healthy population from a previously validated one-dimensional numerical model of the arterial tree. Our results demonstrated that there is near-absolute agreement between the aortic RC and the carotid RC. In particular, a correlation of ~ 1 was reported for a distribution of aortic/carotid RC values equal to 1.76 ± 0.94 s/1.74 ± 0.87 s. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the DPD of the aortic and the carotid pressure waveform. The findings indicate a strong correlation between carotid DPD and aortic DPD, supported by the examination of curve shape and the diastolic decay time constant across a wide range of simulated cardiovascular conditions. Additional investigation is required to validate these results in human subjects and assess their applicability in vivo.

Indexed as

AortaArterial PressureBlood PressureCarotid ArteriesCarotid Artery, CommonHumans

Identifiers

PMID37402771
PMCPMC10319712
OpenAlexW4383186873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.