Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402627›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2023

Humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with B-cell haematological malignancies improve with successive vaccination.

Christopher L Pinder, Dylan Jankovic, Thomas A Fox, Amy Kirkwood, Louise Enfield, Aljawharah Alrubayyi, Emma Touizer, Rosemarie Ford, Rachael Pocock, Jin-Sup Shin and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher L PinderDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4149-226X
Dylan JankovicDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Thomas A FoxDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1163-2295
Amy KirkwoodCR UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London, UK.
Louise EnfieldDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Aljawharah AlrubayyiDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Emma TouizerDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Rosemarie FordDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Rachael PocockDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jin-Sup ShinDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joseph ZieglerDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kirsty J ThomsonDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kirit M ArdeshnaDepartment of Clinical Haematology, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dimitra PeppaDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
Laura E McCoyDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9503-7946
Emma C MorrisDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/N013867/1Medical Research Council MR/W020556/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 216358/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with haematological malignancies are more likely to have poor responses to vaccination. Here we provide detailed analysis of the humoral and cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccination in 69 patients with B-cell malignancies. Measurement of anti-spike IgG in serum demonstrated a low seroconversion rate with 27.1% and 46.8% of patients seroconverting after the first and second doses of vaccine, respectively. In vitro pseudoneutralisation assays demonstrated a poor neutralising response, with 12.5% and 29.5% of patients producing a measurable neutralising titre after the first and second doses, respectively. A third dose increased seropositivity to 54.3% and neutralisation to 51.5%, while a fourth dose further increased both seropositivity and neutralisation to 87.9%. Neutralisation titres post-fourth dose showed a positive correlation with the size of the B-cell population measured by flow cytometry, suggesting an improved response correlating with recovery of the B-cell compartment after B-cell depletion treatments. In contrast, interferon gamma ELISpot analysis showed a largely intact T-cell response, with the percentage of patients producing a measurable response boosted by the second dose to 75.5%. This response was maintained thereafter, with only a small increase following the third and fourth doses, irrespective of the serological response at these timepoints.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematologic NeoplasmsAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesantibodiesB cellshaematological malignanciesinfectionT cellsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID37402627
PMCPMC10953351
OpenAlexW4383100365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.