ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023
Leveraging national and global political determinants of health to promote equity in cancer care.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health services research and advocacy in US cancer care: pathways from evidence to implementation.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- A Health Systems Analysis of Global Head and Neck Cancer Outcomes.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Political determinants of melanoma: Global inequities in skin cancer care.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy: Exploring Political Determinants of Immigrant Health in an Urban County With High Cervical Cancer Disparities.Community health equity research & policy · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Global Radiotherapy Gap.JCO global oncology · 2026Article
- Redefining oropharyngeal cancer in the HPV era: integrating precision medicine and immunotherapeutic frontiers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Factors Influencing Universal Coverage of AI-Assisted Cervical Cancer Screening: Qualitative Study Based on the Macro Model of Health System.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Global determinants of cervical cancer outcomes: a health systems analysis.BMJ oncology · 2026Article
- Bangkok declarations on cancer control in Asia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Political determinants of US states' screening-amenable cancer stage at diagnosis and premature cancer mortality.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Observational
- Enhancing global cancer care for sexual and gender minority populations: regional perspectives and global implications.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Review
- Navigating authoritarian politics: towards reflexive framing in healthcare research.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Racial disparities in prostate cancer in the UK and the USA: similarities, differences and steps forwards.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Political determinants of cancer health.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Investigating the Uptake of Hypofractionation for Breast and Prostate Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Study of Physician and Medical Physicist Perspectives.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Establishing the Philippine Cancer Center National Cancer Research Agenda 2024-2028: Insights and Future Directions.JCO global oncology · 2025Article
- The equitable aging in health conceptual framework: international interventions infusing power and justice to address social isolation and loneliness among older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Growing the global cancer care system: success stories from around the world and lessons for the future.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Disparities in Cardio-Oncology Care Among Patients With Prostate Cancer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Article
- An essential goal within reach: attaining diversity, equity, and inclusion for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute journals.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health and politics are deeply intertwined. In the context of national and global cancer care delivery, political forces-the political determinants of health-influence every level of the cancer care continuum. We explore the "3-I" framework, which structures the upstream political forces that affect policy choices in the context of actors' interests, ideas, and institutions, to examine how political determinants of health underlie cancer disparities. Borrowing from the work of PA Hall, M-P Pomey, CJ Ho, and other thinkers, interests are the agendas of individuals and groups in power. Ideas represent beliefs or knowledge about what is or what should be. Institutions define the rules of play. We provide examples from around the world: Political interests have helped fuel the establishment of cancer centers in India and have galvanized the 2022 Cancer Moonshot in the United States. The politics of ideas underlie global disparities in cancer clinical trials-that is, in the distribution of epistemic power. Finally, historical institutions have helped perpetuate disparities related to racist and colonialist legacies. Present institutions have also been used to improve access for those in greatest need, as exemplified by the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence in Rwanda. In providing these global examples, we demonstrate how interests, ideas, and institutions influence access to cancer care across the breadth of the cancer continuum. We argue that these forces can be leveraged to promote cancer care equity nationally and globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.