Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402596›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2023

Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients.

Karina Spoyalo, Annie Lalande, Chantelle Rizan, Sophia Park, Janet Simons, Philip Dawe, Carl J Brown, Robert Lillywhite, Andrea J MacNeill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The carbon footprint of group and save in elective and emergency surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  19. Reducing the environmental burden of unnecessary investigations.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karina SpoyaloDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Annie LalandeDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chantelle RizanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9518-2948
Sophia ParkDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Janet SimonsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Philip DaweDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carl J BrownDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Robert LillywhiteSchool of Life Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Andrea J MacNeillDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada andrea.macneill@vch.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach.

designPatients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents.

settingSingle-centre tertiary care hospital.

participantsPatients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review.

main outcome measuresIn each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

results76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg CO

conclusionsWe found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesCarbon FootprintHospitalizationHospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesGreenhouse Gasesappropriate carecarbon footprintHealthcare quality improvementhealthcare sustainabilityLaboratory medicineSurgeryUnnecessary Procedures

Identifiers

PMID37402596
PMCPMC10335441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.