Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402549›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2023

Using the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive to explore the characteristics and healthcare use of older housebound patients in England: protocol for a retrospective observational study and clinician survey (the CHiP study).

Elizabeth Winn, Madeleine Kissane, Samuel Wd Merriel, Thomas Brain, Victoria A Silverwood, Ishbel Orla Whitehead, Laura D Howe, Rupert A Payne, Polly Duncan, Primary Care Academic Collaborative (PACT)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth WinnCentre for Academic Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Madeleine KissaneCentre for Academic Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Samuel Wd MerrielCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-9087
Thomas BrainCentre for Academic Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Victoria A SilverwoodSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6754-7129
Ishbel Orla WhiteheadPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Laura D HoweCentre for Academic Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rupert A PayneExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5842-4645
Polly DuncanCentre for Academic Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK polly.duncan@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-3254
Primary Care Academic Collaborative (PACT)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder housebound people are an under-researched group for whom achieving good primary health care can be resource intensive.

aimsTo describe the characteristics and healthcare use of older (≥65 years) housebound people; explore clinician views on delivery of care to housebound people; and assess the feasibility of using a new network of healthcare professionals to deliver high quality research. DESIGN &

settingRetrospective observational study of electronic GP records and clinician survey in England.

methodClinical members of a new UK research network called the Primary care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) will collect the data. For part A, around 20 GP practices will be recruited and clinicians will identify 20 housebound and 20 non-housebound people, matched by age and gender (around 400 total in each group). Anonymised data will be collected on characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation decile), long-term conditions, prescribed medicines, quality of healthcare (via Quality Outcomes Framework targets), and continuity of care. Reports with benchmarked practice-level data will be provided to practices to identify areas for quality improvement and to enhance engagement. For part B, 2-4 clinicians will be recruited from around 50 practices in England (around 150 clinicians) to complete a survey about delivery of healthcare for housebound people. For part C, data will be collected to assess the feasibility of using the PACT network to deliver primary care research.

conclusionOlder housebound people are a neglected group both in terms of research and clinical care. Understanding the characteristics and use of primary healthcare of housebound people will help identify how to improve their care.

Indexed as

Collaborative ResearchGeneral PracticeHealthcare UtilisationHomebound PersonsHouse-bound PersonsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID37402549
PMCPMC11176688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.