Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37402461›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2023

Exploring the impact of various cooking techniques on the physicochemical and quality characteristics of camel meat product.

Mouza Bahwan, Waqas N Baba, Oladipupo Adiamo, Hassan Mohammed Hassan, Ume Roobab, Olalere Olusegun Abayomi, Sajid Maqsood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mouza BahwanDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Waqas N BabaDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Oladipupo AdiamoCentre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Coopers Plains, Brisbane, QLD 4108, Australia.
Hassan Mohammed HassanDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Ume RoobabDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Olalere Olusegun AbayomiAnalytical Biochemistry Research Centre (ABrC), Universiti Sains Malaysia, University Innovation Incubator Building, Sains@USM, 11900 Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Sajid MaqsoodDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
United Arab Emirates University · AEThe University of Queensland · AUUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

United Arab Emirates University UAEU-NRF: 31F024United Arab Emirates University UPAR: 31F078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of four different cooking techniques viz: boiling, grilling, microwave, and frying; on the physicochemical characteristics of camel meat.

methodsProtein composition and their degradation as well as biochemical and textural changes of camel meat as influenced by cooking methods were investigated.

resultsThe highest cooking loss (52.61%) was reported in microwaved samples while grilled samples showed the lowest cooking loss (44.98%). The microwaved samples showed the highest levels of lipid oxidation as measured by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, while boiled samples showed the lowest levels (4.5 mg/kg). Protein solubility, total collagen, and soluble collagen content were highest in boiled samples. Boiled camel meat had lower hardness values compared to the other treated samples. Consequently, boiling was the more suitable cooking technique for producing camel meat with a reduced hardness value and lower lipid oxidation level.

conclusionThe camel meat industry and camel meat consumer can benefit from this research by improving their commercial viability and making consumers aware about the effects of cooking procedures on the quality of camel meat. The results of this study will be of significance to researchers and readers who are working on the processing and quality of camel meat.

Indexed as

Biochemical ChangesCamel Meat ProductCooking MethodsLipidProteinTextural Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37402461
PMCPMC10623037
OpenAlexW4382137722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.