ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2023
[Cognitive deficits with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: a bibliographic revisión]
Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of the ALMA Intervention on Cognitive Function in Women with Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life in cancer survivors aged 65 and older: impact of diagnosis and treatment and perceived decline associated with aging.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Oncopediatric Patients in an Oncology Unit in Cali, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with breast cancer may experience cognitive difficulties from chemotherapy. This alteration is called Chemoinduced Cognitive Impairment, also known as Chemobrain or Chemofog. Objective: To identify the cognitive profile and the characteristics of the neuropsychological assessment in this population. Method: PubMed, SpringerLink and SciELO databases were revised. Articles from 1994 to September 2021 were selected. Keywords related to the study topic were used. Results: Chemotherapy can cause cognitive impairment between 15 and 50% of women. This disturbance may be from multiple aetiologies and can be associated with biological factors and functional and/or structural changes of the CNS. Sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors should be considered as modulating variables. It manifests mainly with memory problems, executive function, attention and processing speed impairment. It can be measured through neuropsychological evaluation instruments. Discussion and conclusion: We suggest that chemo-induced cognitive impairment should be included to the informed consent. Further development of longitudinal studies complemented with neuroimages that allow us to advance in the knowledge of this problem is recommended. A neuropsychological protocol is proposed, which includes screening tests, clinical scales, specific cognitive tests and quality of life questionnaires, within the recommendations of the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.