ArticleClinical drug investigation2023
Real-world Performance of a New Strategy for Off-Label Use of Guselkumab in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Super-Responder Patients as the Epitome of Efficacy and Optimisation.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug Survival of IL-17 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Drugs · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of vunakizumab between super responders and non-super responders of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a post-hoc exploratory analysis of a phase III trial.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Noninferiority of 16-Week vs 8-Week Guselkumab Dosing in Super Responders for Maintaining Control of Psoriasis: The GUIDE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA dermatology · 2024Trial
- International consensus on dose reduction of biologics for patients with psoriasis: The DR. Delphi study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes After Week-12 Response-Guided Secukinumab Discontinuation in Psoriasis: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Article
- Super-Response to Guselkumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Real-World Data With Up to Five Years of Follow-Up in The Czech Republic.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Biological Treatment of Psoriasis-Data So Far.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictive Factors of Early Super-Response to Biologic Agents in Psoriasis: Insights from Real-World Evidence.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Super responders to biologic therapy in psoriasis: definitions, predictors, and implications for precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Real-World Evidence on Dose Spacing of Risankizumab for Psoriasis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Super Responders in Plaque Psoriasis: A Real-World, Multi-Agent Analysis Showing Bimekizumab Associated with the Highest Odds of PASI = 0 at Week 12.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Dose Modulation Strategies in Psoriatic Patients: Real-Life Pilot Comparison Between Risankizumab and Guselkumab up to 12 Months After Dose Spacing.Experimental dermatology · 2025Article
- Characterization of Super-Responder Profile in Chronic Plaque Psoriatic Patients under Guselkumab Treatment: A Long-Term Real-Life Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Dose reduction of biologics in patients with plaque psoriasis: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuselkumab is a drug used to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. However, real-life clinical data on its off-label use are limited, especially regarding the optimal drug dosage regimen for different patient profiles.
objectiveThe main objective of this real-world, single-centre, retrospective study was to identify the off-label guselkumab dosing regimen used in clinical practice. The study also aimed to evaluate the drug's efficacy, safety, and survival, as well as the proportion of super-responders (SR) based on a newly proposed definition.
methodsThe study included 69 patients who started treatment with guselkumab between March 2019 and July 2021. Patients were followed up until April 2022, during which time their efficacy, safety, persistence, and use of guselkumab were recorded. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years and had moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
resultsThe mean disease duration was 18.6 years, and 59% of patients had received at least one biologic treatment before guselkumab with a mean of 1.3 biologics per patient. The initial absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 10.1 and decreased to 2.1 between Week 11-20 without significant changes in the PASI value throughout the 90 weeks of follow-up. The cumulative probability of drug survival was 93.5% at Week 52. No differences were found in terms of efficacy and survival associated with the off-label drug dosage regimens compared to the doses described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The greatest adjustments in the drug administration regimen were achieved in the subgroups of bio-naïve and SR patients, with a reduction in the number of administrations by 40% and 47% compared to the regimen described in the SmPC. Super-response to guselkumab was mainly associated with patients naïve to previous biologic treatment.
conclusionThe study demonstrated that off-label use of guselkumab was safe and effective in real-life clinical practice. The findings suggest that adjustments to the drug administration regimen may be necessary to optimise its use in different patient profiles, especially in SR and bio-naïve patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.