ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2024
Radiodiagnostics of standard orthodontic radiographs-dental and extradental incidental findings : Do we see everything we should see?
Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe extent of undetected incidental findings in routine orthodontic radiographs is still unknown. However, incidental findings that are not in the primary focus of orthodontic diagnostics may be of high medical relevance. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse whether incidental findings are reliably detected and which parameters influence the orthodontist's assessment.
methodsIn a clinical cross-sectional study 134 orthodontists evaluated two orthopantomogram (OPT) and two lateral cephalogram (LC) radiographs each via a standardised online survey. The radiographs were previously examined by three dentists and one radiologist-in a pilot phase-regarding the number of incidental findings and subsequently defining as gold standard in a consensus procedure. The radiographs were presented consecutively, the number of incidental findings detected were noted and the individual findings could be described in free text form.
resultsOverall, 39.1% of the incidental findings were detected. The orthodontists' focus was primarily on the dental region. Here, 57.9% of incidental findings were detected, while 20.3% were detected in extradental regions (p < 0.001). A highly relevant finding of suspected arteriosclerotic plaque was detected in 7.5% of cases (OPT). Significantly more incidental findings were detected on OPTs than on LCs (OPT 42.1%, LC 36.0%, p < 0.001). As participants' length of professional experience increased, significantly more time was spent on the assessment (p < 0.001), correlating positively with the detection of incidental findings.
conclusionsEven in daily routine practice, attention must be paid to a thorough assessment of all radiographed regions. The factors time and professional experience can prevent practitioners from overlooking findings outside the orthodontic focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.