Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37401941›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Complementary and alternative medicine in oncology: knowledge, attitude and practice among Tunisian healthcare workers.

Asma Ammar, Asma Soua, Olfa Ezzi, Souhir Chelly, Nouha Ammar, Faten Ezzairi, Nouha Khenissi, Imene Chabchoub, Slim Ben Ahmed, Mohamed Mahjoub and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Asma AmmarDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Asma SouaDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia. soua.asma@outlook.com.
Olfa EzziDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Souhir ChellyDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Nouha AmmarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Faten EzzairiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Nouha KhenissiHigher Institute of Nursing Sciences of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
Imene ChabchoubDepartment of Medical Oncology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Slim Ben AhmedDepartment of Medical Oncology, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Mohamed MahjoubDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.
Mansour NjahDepartment of Hospital Hygiene, Farhat Hached University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver the past years, there has been a considerable increase in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among cancer patients. However, guidance from health care workers (HCWs) is not always provided. We aimed to determine the knowledge, attitude and practice of Tunisian HCWs regarding the use of CAM in cancer patients.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study over 5 months from February to June 2022 among HCWs caring for cancer patients in the Tunisian center region. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire developed by our investigators.

resultsThe level of knowledge about CAM was declared limited by 78.4% of our population. The best known CAM therapies were herbal medicine and homeopathy while chiropractic and hypnosis where the least. HCWs who had sought information on CAM represented 54.3% of our sample and the main source of information was the Internet (37.1%). A positive attitude towards the use of CAM was found in 56% of HCWs. The integration of CAM into supportive care in oncology was approved by 78% of HCWs. Concerning training on CAM, 78% declared its necessity for HCWs and 73.3% expressed a desire to have it. A personal use of CAM was found in 53% of HCWs while 38.8% had previously used CAM in the treatment of their cancer patients.

conclusionThe majority of HCWs had a positive attitude towards the use of CAM in oncology despite their poor knowledge about it. Our study emphasizes the need to train HCWs dealing with cancer patients on CAM.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesNeoplasmsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeCancer PatientsComplementary and Alternative MedicineKnowledgePractice, Healthcare Workers

Identifiers

PMID37401941
PMCPMC11798107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.