Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37401461›Full record

ArticleCirculation2023

Survival From Birth Until Young Adulthood Among Individuals With Congenital Heart Defects: CH STRONG.

Karrie F Downing, Wendy N Nembhard, Charles E Rose, Jennifer G Andrews, Anthony Goudie, Scott E Klewer, Matthew E Oster, Sherry L Farr

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decreasing radiation exposure in interventional pediatric cardiology: a 10-year European single-center analysis of 3683 procedures.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A De Novo Loss-of-FunctionChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karrie F DowningNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (K.F.D., C.E.R., M.E.O., S.L.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-3063-1781
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health and the Arkansas Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (W.N.N.).
Charles E RoseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (K.F.D., C.E.R., M.E.O., S.L.F.).
Jennifer G AndrewsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson (J.G.A., S.E.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-0064-3933
Anthony GoudieDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Applied Research and Evaluation, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR (A.G.).
Scott E KlewerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson (J.G.A., S.E.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-4266-5740
Matthew E OsterNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (K.F.D., C.E.R., M.E.O., S.L.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-2243-8367
Sherry L FarrNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (K.F.D., C.E.R., M.E.O., S.L.F.).ORCID 0000-0002-9773-9009
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USUniversity of Arizona · USArkansas Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited population-based information is available on long-term survival of US individuals with congenital heart defects (CHDs). Therefore, we assessed patterns in survival from birth until young adulthood (ie, 35 years of age) and associated factors among a population-based sample of US individuals with CHDs.

methodsIndividuals born between 1980 and 1997 with CHDs identified in 3 US birth defect surveillance systems were linked to death records through 2015 to identify those deceased and the year of their death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for infant mortality (ie, death during the first year of life), and Cox proportional hazard ratios for survival after the first year of life (aHRs) were used to estimate the probability of survival and associated factors. Standardized mortality ratios compared infant mortality, >1-year mortality, >10-year mortality, and >20-year mortality among individuals with CHDs with general population estimates.

resultsAmong 11 695 individuals with CHDs, the probability of survival to 35 years of age was 81.4% overall, 86.5% among those without co-occurring noncardiac anomalies, and 92.8% among those who survived the first year of life. Characteristics associated with both infant mortality and reduced survival after the first year of life, respectively, included severe CHDs (aRR=4.08; aHR=3.18), genetic syndromes (aRR=1.83; aHR=3.06) or other noncardiac anomalies (aRR=1.54; aHR=2.53), low birth weight (aRR=1.70; aHR=1.29), and Hispanic (aRR=1.27; aHR=1.42) or non-Hispanic Black (aRR=1.43; aHR=1.80) maternal race and ethnicity. Individuals with CHDs had higher infant mortality (standardized mortality ratio=10.17), >1-year mortality (standardized mortality ratio=3.29), and >10-year and >20-year mortality (both standardized mortality ratios ≈1.5) than the general population; however, after excluding those with noncardiac anomalies, >1-year mortality for those with nonsevere CHDs and >10-year and >20-year mortality for those with any CHD were similar to the general population.

conclusionsEight in 10 individuals with CHDs born between1980 and 1997 survived to 35 years of age, with disparities by CHD severity, noncardiac anomalies, birth weight, and maternal race and ethnicity. Among individuals without noncardiac anomalies, those with nonsevere CHDs experienced similar mortality between 1 and 35 years of age as in the general population, and those with any CHD experienced similar mortality between 10 and 35 years of age as in the general population.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalAdolescentAdultChildEthnicityHispanic or LatinoHumansInfantInfant MortalityRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultadultepidemiologyheart defects, congenitalmortalitysurvival

Identifiers

PMID37401461
PMCPMC10544792
OpenAlexW4383058667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.