Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37400911›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Trauma-specific mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for women with post-traumatic stress disorder and a history of domestic abuse: intervention refinement and a randomised feasibility trial (coMforT study).

Natalia V Lewis, Alison Gregory, Gene S Feder, Aishlyn Angill-Williams, Sophie Bates, Joel Glynn, Gemma Halliwell, Claire Hawcroft, David Kessler, Michael Lawton and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Acceptability, Safety and Impact of a Play Co-Developed With Public Contributors as a Format for Disseminating Research on a Sensitive Subject.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Natalia V LewisNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. nat.lewis@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4839-6548
Alison GregoryBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Gene S FederNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Aishlyn Angill-WilliamsBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Sophie BatesBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Joel GlynnBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Gemma HalliwellBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Claire HawcroftBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
David KesslerNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Michael LawtonBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Rwth LeachNIHR Clinical Research Network (CRN), Bristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Sarah MillbandBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Katherine PittBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Stan ZammitNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Alice MalpassBristol Medical School (PHS), University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who have experienced domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are at increased risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD). In 2014-2015, we developed a prototype trauma-specific mindfulness-based cognitive therapy curriculum (TS-MBCT) for the treatment of PTSD in a DVA population. This study aimed to refine the prototype TS-MBCT and evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

methodsIntervention refinement phase was informed by evidence synthesis from a literature review, qualitative interviews with professionals and DVA survivors, and a consensus exercise with experts in trauma and mindfulness. We tested the refined TS-MBCT intervention in an individually randomised parallel group feasibility trial with pre-specified progression criteria, a traffic light system, and embedded process and health economics evaluations.

resultsThe TS-MBCT intervention consisted of eight group sessions and home practice. We screened 109 women in a DVA agency and recruited 20 (15 TS-MBCT, 5 self-referral to National Health Service (NHS) psychological treatment), with 80% follow-up at 6 months. Our TS-MBCT intervention had 73% uptake, 100% retention, and high acceptability. Participants suggested recruitment via multiple agencies, and additional safety measures. Randomisation into the NHS control arm did not work due to long waiting lists and previous negative experiences. Three self-administered PTSD/CPTSD questionnaires produced differing outcomes thus a clinician administered measure might work better. We met six out of nine feasibility progression criteria at green and three at amber targets demonstrating that it is possible to conduct a full-size RCT of the TS-MBCT intervention after making minor amendments to recruitment and randomisation procedures, the control intervention, primary outcomes measures, and intervention content. At 6 months, none of the PTSD/CPTSD outcomes ruled out a clinically important difference between trial arms indicating that it is reasonable to proceed to a full-size RCT to estimate these outcomes with greater precision.

conclusionsA future RCT of the coMforT TS-MBCT intervention should have an internal pilot, recruit from multiple DVA agencies, NHS and non-NHS settings, have an active control psychological treatment, use robust randomisation and safety procedures, and clinician-administered measures for PTSD/CPTSD.

trial registrationISRCTN64458065 11/01/2019.

Indexed as

Domestic violenceFeasibility studies, pilot projectsIntimate partner biolenceMind-Body therapiesMindfulnessMindfulness-based cognitive therapyPsychosocial interventionStress disorders, post-traumatic

Identifiers

PMID37400911
PMCPMC10316568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.