Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37400868›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2023

Patient journey for hypertension and dyslipidemia in Saudi Arabia: highlighting the evidence gaps.

Ashraf Amir, Mirvat Alasnag, Rajaa Al-Raddadi, Tawfik Al-Bassam, Kanwal Saeed, Mehmet Yazıcıoğlu, Ayman Shabana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypertensive patient's journey in Poland.BMC health services research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashraf AmirFamily Medicine Department, International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mirvat AlasnagCardiac Center, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital-Jeddah-Saudi Arabia, PO Box 9862, Jeddah, 21159, Saudi Arabia. mirvat@jeddacath.com.
Rajaa Al-RaddadiFaculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Tawfik Al-BassamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Reference Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Kanwal SaeedResearch, Development and Medical, Pfizer Upjohn, Dubai, UAE.
Mehmet YazıcıoğluEmerging Markets Medical Portfolio Implementation Lead, Viatris, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayman ShabanaViatris, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jeddah University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Fahd Armed Forces Hospital · SAPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, Saudi Arabia has witnessed staggering rates of hypertension and dyslipidemia-related cardiovascular (CV) deaths, overburdening the healthcare ecosystem of the country. Appropriate public health interventions can be devised through quantitative mapping of evidence. Identification of potential data gaps can prioritize future research needs and develop a 'best-fit' framework for patient-centric management of hypertension and dyslipidemia.

methodsThis review quantified data gaps in the prevalence and key epidemiological touchpoints of the patient journey including awareness, screening, diagnosis, treatment, adherence, and control in patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia in Saudi Arabia. Studies published in English between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified through a structured search on MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and PubMed databases. An unstructured search on public and government websites, including Saudi Ministry of Health, without date limits was carried out to fill data gaps. After exclusion of studies based on predefined criteria, a total of 14 studies on hypertension and 12 studies and one anecdotal evidence for dyslipidemia were included in the final analyses.

resultsThe prevalence of hypertension was reported to be 14.0%-41.8% while that for dyslipidemia was 12.5%-62.0%. The screening rate for hypertension was 100.0% as revealed by the nationwide surveys. Among hypertensive patients, only 27.6%-61.1% patients were aware of their condition, 42.2% patients underwent diagnosis, 27.9%-78.9% patients received antihypertensive treatment, 22.5% patients adhered to treatment medication, while blood pressure (BP) control was achieved in 27.0%-45.0% patients. Likewise, among patients with dyslipidemia, 10.5%-47.3% patients were aware of their condition, 34.6% patients were screened, and 17.8% underwent diagnosis. Although high treatment rates ranging from 40.0%-94.0% were reported, medication adherence recorded was 45.0%-77.4% among the treated patients. The overall low control rates ranged from 28.0%-41.5%.

conclusionsThe study findings highlight evidence gaps along key touchpoints of patient journey. Reinforcing the efforts for high-quality evidence-based research at a national level may pave a path for better resource utilization and provide guidance to practice and amend health policies for patients, healthcare practitioners (HCPs), and healthcare policy makers for better patient outcomes in Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseDyslipidemiaHypertensionKingdom of Saudi ArabiaPatient journeyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID37400868
PMCPMC10316580
OpenAlexW4382927699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.