ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Physical function and activity, pain, and health status in adults with myelomeningocele after orthotic management from childhood: a descriptive study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gait in childhood and adulthood in persons with myelomeningocele - a retrospective analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Surgical management of a meningomyelocele in a cat.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Sensory and Motor Function, Pain, and Health Status in Children with Arthrogryposis and Myelomeningocele.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with myelomeningocele (MMC) exhibit neurological deficits below the lesion level involving both motor and sensory functions. Ambulation and functional outcomes in patients offered orthotic management since childhood were investigated.
methodsPhysical function, physical activity, pain, and health status were assessed in a descriptive study.
resultsOf 59 adults with MMC, aged 18-33 years, 12 were in the community ambulation (Ca), 19 in the household ambulation (Ha), six in the non-functional (N-f), and 22 in the non-ambulation (N-a) groups. Orthoses were used by 78% (n = 46), i.e., by 10/12 in the Ca, 17/19 in the Ha, 6/6 in the N-f, and 13/22 in the N-a groups. In the ten-metre walking test, the non-orthosis group (NO) walked faster than those wearing ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) or free-articulated knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFO-Fs), the Ca group faster than the Ha and N-f groups, and the Ha group faster than the N-f group. In the six-minute walking test, the Ca group walked farther than the Ha group. In the five times sit-to-stand test, the AFO and KAFO-F groups required longer than the NO group, and the KAFO-F group longer than the foot orthosis (FO) group. Lower extremity function with orthoses was higher in the FO than the AFO and KAFO-F groups, higher in the KAFO-F than the AFO group, and higher in the AFO group than in those using trunk-hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses. Functional independence increased with ambulatory function. Time spent in physical recreation was higher in the Ha than the Ca and N-a groups. There were no differences between the ambulation groups in rated pain or reported health status.
conclusionThe physical function results in persons with MMC improve our understanding of this population's heterogeneity and shed light on the importance of individualized orthotic management. The similarities between the various ambulatory levels in physical activity, pain, and health status may mirror opportunities to achieve equal results regardless of disability level. A clinical implication of the study is that orthotic management is likely to be beneficial for the patient with MMC of which the majority used their orthoses for most time of the day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.